Tuesday, December 2, 2025

The Secret MAiD Case That Canada Hoped You’d Never See

This article was published by Kelsi Sheren on her substack on December 2, 2025.

These Leaked Documents Reveal the Plot.


By Kelsi Sheren

Canada keeps insisting MAiD is “carefully regulated,” a “last resort,” and “only for Canadians who truly qualify.”

That story is dead and I’m going to show you how bad this really is.

A Freedom of Information release buried in 269 pages of bureaucratic emails shows something the government never expected anyone to see:

Three elected officials actively tried to secure an MSP health number for a woman who was not a resident, not a citizen, and not eligible under federal law… so she could be euthanized.

This wasn’t a misunderstanding. This wasn’t a clerical error. This was an attempt to turn Canada into a destination for state-sanctioned death.

Let’s walk through exactly what they did. The FOI shows that in July 2021 ->

Elizabeth May, Member of Parliament and then-leader of the federal Green Party

Adam Olsen, BC Green Party MLA

Murray Rankin, BC NDP MLA and Minister of Indigenous Relations.

…each wrote letters of political support for a woman name redacted who was not a permanent resident, not a citizen, had no permit, had no visa pathway to MSP, and had lived in Canada only as a “visitor” since 1990/91.

In other words: no legal eligibility for healthcare.

The politicians knew that. The Ministry knew that. And still they pushed hard. Thinking none of this would ever see daylight.

Today is that day. The purpose behind all this pressure? To get her a Personal Health Number so she could access MAiD. Not medical treatment. Not emergency care. Not residency.

Just euthanasia. Death by a needle and a paralytic.




This is not “compassion.” This is a government machine being bent to facilitate death tourism and here’s the thing: the ministry knew exactly what was happening.

Internal emails make it painfully clear that MAiD federally requires eligibility for public healthcare. The Ministry repeats it like a warning flare: “Visitors to Canada are not eligible for medical assistance in dying.”

Another official spells it out: “The client cannot qualify for MSP without a foundation document (permit, PR, citizenship).”

And the most stark line in the entire FOI: MSP should only be granted “on compassionate grounds so that she can access MAiD.”

There’s no ambiguity. No euphemism. No plausible deniability.









The only reason these politicians wanted MSP issued was to enable a foreign national to be euthanized by the Canadian state. MAiD tourism wasn’t a side effect it was the goal the entire damn time.

This wasn’t an attempt to help someone become a resident. No visa support. No PR application. No documentation pathway. The letters from May, Olsen, and Rankin all revolve around one mission: Get this woman a PHN so she can be killed under MAiD.

In one email, staff even warned: “Unless these provide new PR or citizenship status they unfortunately don’t address the factors.”

Translated: These politicians are trying to do something we legally can’t do. But the pressure kept coming anyway. And for what it’s worth?

This was escalated as “High Importance.” The Ministry scheduled a call with the client for July 23rd at 11:00 am a MAiD-related call.

They were ready to move fast. If this case has succeeded, Canada will have secretly created a new category of MAiD eligibility. Anyone from anywhere in the world can fly here and apply for state-sanctioned death as long as a sympathetic politician writes a letter.

No residency. No citizenship. No ties to Canada.

Just an express lane to death. And the public? Never consulted. Never informed.
Never asked whether they wanted their country turned into the world’s suicide embassy.

And here’s the uncomfortable reality. We don’t know for sure if the MAiD was carried out but if I’m betting, I’m betting it did.

Elizabeth May is not a fringe actor.
Adam Olsen is not a fringe actor.
Murray Rankin is not a fringe actor.


These are leaders in the Green Party and NDP two parties that aggressively pushed MAiD expansion.

Now we know what “expansion” meant behind closed doors.
They were willing to extend MAiD to non-Canadians in secret.

Ask yourself this, why are Canadian politicians working harder to help a non-citizen die…than they work to help Canadians live?

Why is it easier to get a politician’s support for euthanasia than for housing, healthcare, mental health treatment, or veterans’ support? Why did no one in government blow the whistle?

And what other cases like this exist that we haven’t seen? Where there’s smoke, there’s fire and now I’m digging. Deep.

MAiD was sold as dignity. It was sold as mercy. It was sold as a humane option for extreme cases. Those were lies, all of them. The mask has slipped.

When elected officials are trying to secure taxpayer-funded infrastructure to euthanize foreign nationals who aren’t even living here legally, the system is no longer compassionate.

It is industrial. It is bureaucratic. It is dehumanized. And it is out of control.

The FOI doesn’t show a “mistake.” It shows a machine doing exactly what it was built to do. Normalize death as a solution.

Not for Canadians alone. For anyone. Welcome to MAiD tourism. And it’s already started. The FOI documents don’t just reveal a single rogue letter. They reveal a coordinated political push involving:

A sitting federal MP (Elizabeth May) A BC MLA (Adam Olsen) A BC cabinet minister (Hon. Murray Rankin)

All acting within a 48-hour window. All applying pressure. All requesting a provincial health number for a woman who was not a Canadian resident, not a citizen, and not eligible for MAiD under federal law.

These were not bureaucratic mistakes. These were political interventions and here is what accountability looks like the bare minimum any functioning democracy should expect.

Murray Rankin: The Minister Who Tried to Influence MAiD Eligibility

Rankin’s involvement carries the greatest weight. He wasn’t simply an MLA with opinions he was a sitting cabinet minister writing on official Legislative Assembly letterhead, invoking his authority as:

“Minister of Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation.”

His letter expresses “unqualified support” for granting an emergency MSP number to the applicant. He knew she was not a resident, not eligible, not covered — and still pushed the Health Minister to make it happen. The purpose is self-evident from the internal emails:

Grant MSP → Enable MAiD.

A cabinet minister trying to steer a non-resident into state-sanctioned euthanasia is a structural failure that demands a structural consequence.

What should happen next is simple. A formal ministerial conduct investigation
Assess misuse of authority, inappropriate intervention, and violation of health-policy boundaries. Full public disclosure of his involvement. Who asked him to intervene? Did he coordinate with May or Olsen? What did he know about the MAiD intent? Permanent disqualification from public office if misconduct is confirmed A minister who tries to influence eligibility for state-administered death especially for a foreign national has forfeited public trust.

Adam Olsen: The MLA Who Pushed for “Compassionate” MSP to Enable MAiD


Olsen’s letter asked for MSP on “compassionate grounds,” despite full knowledge that the woman had no citizenship, no permanent residency, no legal eligibility, no basis for MSP.

He even invoked Indigenous identity in support of the request adding ethical weight to an already reckless intervention.

What should happen next is a retroactive ethics review. His actions must be formally evaluated by BC’s legislative standards office. A public explanation. He must explain why he intervened and whether the effort was coordinated with May and Rankin. Accountability within the BC Green Party. The party must clarify whether this conduct aligns with their values or if they repudiate it.

Elizabeth May: The Sitting MP Who Still Holds Power. May is the only one still in elected office. Her letter acknowledges the applicant is not a permanent resident, not eligible for MSP, and would not qualify under normal circumstances.

Yet she still pushed for temporary MSP specifically to enable MAiD. A federal MP attempting to influence provincial health systems to euthanize a foreign national is not compassion. It is a misuse of political influence for a purpose no Canadian voted for.

What should happen at a bare minimum, FIRED. Immediate investigation by the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner. This is textbook misuse of office. Mandatory parliamentary hearing She must publicly answer:
– Why she intervened
– What she understood about the MAiD eligibility rules
– Whether this was coordinated
– Whether she has done this before


Potential censure or resignation depending on findings. When the issue is life and death, consequences must match the stakes.

Three Politicians. Forty-Eight Hours. One Objective.

This was not a coincidence. This was not random empathy. This was not a compassionate outlier.

This was a coordinated attempt by three elected officials municipal, provincial, and federal to pressure a healthcare system to euthanize a foreign national who did not qualify under any law.

You cannot spin your way out of that. You cannot redact your way out of that and you cannot pretend Canadians consented to becoming a destination for state-administered death.

This is what MUST HAPPEN NEXT.

Investigations. Hearings. Public accountability. Consequences.


Because if a government is willing to kill someone outside the system, it has already abandoned the idea of protecting the people within it.

KELSI SHEREN

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Come to Canada. We'll kill you. Nice. What aggravates me is why people feel the push for "someone else" to do it? I know this sounds crass but if you want your life over so much, there are ways to do it. Definitely ways to do it.
Why involve anyone else? Oh right, because suicide is a sin but asking you to help me commit suicide isn't??? Or maybe it's because assisted suicide could still allow insurance policies to be paid out, but suicide won't. Or maybe it's the "well I want to die peacefully" argument. Or maybe the family left behind won't be so hurt and torn up over my loss if I present it done more medically?
Well boo hoo to you. Birth wasn't without suffering , and not every death is without suffering. Maid is not peaceful for everyone. It's just a cry for help when no one is willing or possibly able to help anymore. But you cutting off your suffering on earth...is no guarantee you won't still have to go through a suffering prior to peace in the hereafter. We can't know that for sure.
Suffering can be helped with good palliative care. I know this may sound void of compassion, but it's just anger over the constant banter of "my right to die this way" when it ultimately forces the involvement of others.

CL said...

Yes it is a sin. Also, possibly, life insurance won't pay out if it is a suicide? It would be good to know for sure but this article indicates if your policy is less than 2 years old, cause of death being suicide means the policy won't pay out. Other risks for non payout of insurance includes causes of death like DUI, extreme sports, drug overdose. I have not fact checked this but it makes sense. If someone wanted to die but didn't want your beneficiaries to be financially destitute, M.A.I.D. would hold appeal. This leads back to the problems in our economy where there seems to be very little help of escaping poverty or ever improving your financials situation.
https://www.canadalife.com/insurance/life-insurance/reasons-why-life-insurance-might-not-pay-out.html

Anonymous said...

I worked Palliative unit for 15 years as a registered nurse. One family in particular stands out to me. Before maid in Canada I was caring for a young dying mother while her helpless husband and two sons watched on. The husband begged me to give her something to, well, end her suffering. I asked him if he could do this to her and he replied, definitely not, to this I replied, then don’t ask me too.
I then taught them how to care for her with love and compassion and together with Dr and Pharmacist we were able to get suitable pain management. Months later this husband sought me out to thank me for teaching them compassionate love.

Alex Schadenberg said...

Dear CL. Life Insurance, in Canada, does pay out if it is a euthanasia (MAiD) death. The legislation defines the act as not being a suicide.

Anonymous said...

When is 'killing youself' not suicide?... why, when you get the Government's permission to say it's OK of course. Sick society.

Disgusted_Canadian said...

I Am Appalled!!! I Cannot Believe Green Party Leader Elizabeth May And Other 2 Politicians For Trying To KILL A WOMAN UNDER THE TERMS OF COMPASSION FOR SUFFERING AFTER DONATING TO THE COMMUNITY, PAYING TAXES, BEING A VOCAL SUPPORT FOR SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE AND STATING ALL THIS IN LETTERS TO SUPPORT HER BEING KILLED, IT SOUNDS ALL CRAZY AND HYPOCRITICAL, AND I AGREE WITH Kelsi Sheren That There Definitely NEEDS TO BE: Investigations, Hearings, Public accountability, Consequences AND THE PUBLIC TO BE INFORMED ABOUT ALL THIS FOR THOSE 3 POLITICIANS SUPPORTING KILLING AND HOMICIDE AFTER STATING WHAT A GREAT PERSON THE WOMAN IS!!! THAT IS INSANE AND HYPOCRITICAL AND WHO WOULD HAVE EVER THOUGHT AND KNOWN ALL OF THIS!!! I MAKES ME SO UPSET BEING A SUPPORTER OF THE GREEN PARTY TOO AND A SUPPORTER FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLE AND THERE LAND THAT THOSE LEADERS ALL ALLOWED ALL OF THIS WHILE KEEPING THE PUBLIC IN THE DARK BEHIND THEIR EVIL!!! DISGUSTING AND WRONG!!!
PEOPLE SHOULD ALSO BE AWARE THAT ANYONE HELPING KILLERS OR KILLING AND HOMICIDE IS THE BIGGER SIN BECAUSE THOSE PEOPLE HAVE THE POWER TO KILL AND TO HELP BUT THEY CHOOSE TO KILL INSTEAD OF HELPING THE VULNERABLE, SICK, ILL WITH PROPER CARE, PROPER MEDICATION, PROPER RESOURCES, PROPER MONEY, PROPER HOUSING, THEY HAVE THE POWER BUT THEY CHOOSE MONEY FOR THEMSELVES OVER PROPERLY HELPING WHEN THEY ALREADY HAVE ALL THE LEGAL PROTECTIONS FOR THEMSELVES (IN THIS LIFE), MONEY AND MATERIAL PROTECTIONS (IN THIS LIFE), SO NOTHING FOR THEM TO LOSE TO ACTUALLY "HELP" IN PROPER AND NATURAL WAYS ACCORDING TO NATURAL LAW, SO IT IS THEM MAKING THE BIGGER SIN AND MAY GOD INTERVENE TO STOP THEM AND TEACH THEM AND OTHER KILLERS TO STOP THEIR EVIL OR THERE WILL BE BIG CONSEQUENCES FOR THEM;

THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT DID ALL OF THIS PRIOR In July 2021 ACCORDING TO THE FOI DOCUMENTS (AS THEY WERE DATED) AND DURING THE COVID "KILLING" ERA OF THE VACCINE FORCE ON EVERYONE AND POLICIES TO KILL AND MAKE THE PHARMA COMPANIES MONEY,
SO I AM WONDERING, WAS THERE ANY MONEY MAKING OPPORTUNITIES FOR THESE 3 POLITICIANS WHO TRIED TO GET THIS WOMAN KILLED??? HOW CAN WE FIND THAT OUT??? ONLY IF THE Canadian GOVERNMENT "DECIDES" IF THEY WILL INVESTIGATE??? AND ONLY IF THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT "DECIDES" THEY WILL RELEASE THIS TO THE PUBLIC???
SOMETHING NEEDS TO BE DONE IMMEDIATELY!!!

Alex Schadenberg said...

In response to the comment, when is "killing yourself" not suicide. Well in the case of MAiD it is homicide. MAiD is not a self-killing, but rather you are killed. In Canada it is done by a physician or nurse practitioner, so it is homicide/murder.

Anonymous said...

True Alex! :(

Anonymous said...

I’ve sent this article to my M.P., She was interested and appalled in knowing about this. Please do the same!

Anonymous said...

If u requested death why would u not call that suicide? Yes the doctor is murdering a human being but that human has asked for the murder to take place so wouldn’t the death be a suicide and the provider a murderer. How can a person asking for death not be engaging in suicide?