The assisted suicide lobby have targeted Arizona for legalization

Alex Schadenberg
Executive Director, Euthanasia Prevention Coalition

I have stated many times that the assisted suicide lobby has targeted Arizona and Florida for legalization based on the demographics of those states.

Now that Arizona assisted suicide bill (HB 2569) died a natural death, the assisted suicide lobby has begun a propaganda campaign to pave the way for assisted suicide legalization in 2027 with an article written by Claudia Núñez that was published in the AZCentral titled: Death with Dignity Laws are spreading, so why not in Arizona?

The article reads like an assisted suicide propaganda piece.

The assisted suicide lobby is concerned about the euthanasia stories that are being published. Núñez writes:

Although medical aid in dying and euthanasia are often used interchangeably in everyday language, they are governed by very different legal, medical, and ethical frameworks. Euthanasia is widely permitted in other countries, even for patients experiencing chronic, non-terminal suffering such as occurred this week in Spain.

The key distinction lies in the final act. Under Medical Aid in Dying (MAID), the patient must self-administer the medication. The physician prescribes the drug but does not directly participate in administering it. In active euthanasia, medical personnel directly administer the lethal substance once specific requirements are met.

The article is right when it states that the key distinction between euthanasia and assisted suicide is the completion of the act. The intention to kill and the lethal poison are not different, the only difference is who carries out the act.

Núñez explains, from the point of view of the assisted suicide lobby, the euthanasia death of Noelia Castillo Ramos (25) who was recently killed by lethal injection in Spain.

Núñez argues that American assisted suicide statutes have very strict guidelines while ignoring the fact that in 2023 in Oregon, the longest time of an assisted suicide death was 137 hours. In 2024, the Oregon Health Authority reported that the ingestion status was unknown in 178 of the 607 lethal poison prescriptions that had been approved and received. In other words, there is no effective oversight of the Oregon law.

The article continues with more propaganda promoting the assisted suicide talking points and ends by confirming that the assisted suicide lobby will continue lobbying politicians and they will support another Arizona assisted suicide bill in 2027.

Florida doctors say NO to Assisted Suicide.

Alex Schadenberg
Executive Director, Euthanasia Prevention Coalition

Dr George Everett

The Orlando-Sentinel published a Guest Column on March 27 by Dr George Everett, the governor and president of the American College of Physicians, Florida Chapter.

Florida is currently debating assisted suicide Bills (S864/H1231).

Everett writes in his Guest Column:

As a physician, the overwhelming majority of my colleagues and I do not wish to participate in PAS. The American College of Physicians, the largest physician specialty organization in the world, and the American Medical Association, the largest physician organization in the United States, have both written extensively on the ethics surrounding euthanasia and assisted suicide and vigorously oppose physicians’ involvement in either activity.

Here are some of our reasons for opposition.

First, Hospice and Palliative Medicine, a relatively new specialty, is greatly underused and often sought at the very end of life rather than earlier when suffering can be allayed. Second, a slippery slope of misuse of PAS has already been shown to occur in countries where it is legal. For example, the Dutch have expanded euthanasia (most often delivered by physicians) from adults who have given consent, to now include children from ages 1-12 where parents have given consent. Third, two of the four key ethical principles of medical care, beneficence (promote well-being) and non-maleficence (do no harm), are violated with PAS. Fourth, loss of trust in the physician as a healer and comforter with the best interests of the patient at the forefront of the relationship, is compromised.

Technically, the use of medication to assist in suicide is suspect. Medical science has not produced a medication that can be orally self-administered which results in certain and painless death. The most consistently successful suicides are through methods that a physician would not be able to provide or suggest. Medication overdose, on the other hand, is the most common layman’s method of suicide attempt and is usually unsuccessful.

Furthermore, suicide is strongly associated with social and demographic factors. Men commit 80% of suicides. The highest rate of suicide is among Native Americans and non-Hispanic whites while the lowest rates are in Asians, Blacks and Hispanics. Imagine, for a minute, that PAS was delivered more often to some social or demographic groups compared to others. Suspicions about motives and accusations about discrimination would surely be asserted. Trust in the medical profession would suffer.

PAS and euthanasia are essentially unnecessary with tools currently available to relieve suffering as people near the end of life. As physicians, we much more frequently encounter patients and families who demand maximum therapy, often painful and futile, all the way to the end of life, than those who request hospice or palliative care that could minimize suffering. This observation is supported by studies funded from the National Institute of Health which found that more than 20% of all Medicare expenses go to people in the last year of life, with only a minimal proportion spent on hospice care.

Citizens of the state of Florida would be poorly served by physicians assisting in suicide but would be greatly benefited by education about the effectiveness of hospice and palliative care to limit suffering near the end of life.

Everett was responding to an earlier article by Scott Maxwell which supported assisted suicide.