Alex Schadenberg Executive Director, Euthanasia Prevention Coalition
Noelia Castillo
I am saddened by the death of Noelia Castillo (25) who was killed by euthanasia on March 27. Some reports stated that organ procurement followed her death.
Castillo was approved for euthanasia in July 2024 based on partial paraplegia that was caused by her suicide attempt in October 2022. Castillo stated that her suicide attempt was related to being sexually assaulted.
Psychiatric reports indicate that the young woman has chronic depressive symptoms and an adjustment disorder with anxiety and depression, but rule out a major depressive disorder that would impair her decision-making capacity. She has also been diagnosed with obsessive-compulsive disorder and borderline personality disorder.
The father of Noelia Castillo challenged the euthanasia approval all the way up to the European Court of Human Rights.
Noelia Castillo was originally scheduled to be killed by euthanasia on August 2 but a judge suspended the death until a higher court could hear the case after her father challenged her approval for euthanasia.
On August 8, 2024, I reported that the father of a 23 year-old Spanish woman, (Noelia Castillo) challenged in court the approval of euthanasia for his daughter. The father argued in court that his daughter, who was living with partial paralysis, lacked the capacity to decide to be killed by euthanasia. Castillo became paralyzed after a suicide attempt.
On March 17, 2025 I reported that a Spanish court rejected an appeal by the father of Castillo his 24-year-old paraplegic daughter, who had been approved to be killed by euthanasia. An article published by Agence France-Presse reported that:
The father argued that his daughter suffered from mental disorders that "could affect her ability to make a free and conscious decision" as required by law.
He also said there were indications his daughter had changed her mind and that her ailment did not entail "unbearable physical or psychological suffering".
The article reported that the court decision decided that the woman met the conditions for euthanasia, which was legalised in the European country in 2021.
Laia Galiá reported for the Spanish ARA news on April 3, 2025 that a second challenge to a euthanasia approval would be heard by a Spanish Court. Galiá reported that the first decision was appealed by the Prosecutor's Office and Castillo's father. The case was referred to the High Court of Justice (TSJC)
On February 20, 2026 Reuters reported that Noelia Castillo who become disabled after an attempted suicide has been once again approved to be killed by euthanasia after Spain's Constitutional Court rejected the appeal by Castillo's father.
The case was then referred to the European Court of Human Rights who rejected the appeal on March 10, 2026.
The human rights of people with disabilities are on the line. People with disabilities who are living with suicidal ideation can be killed by lethal poison based on being disabled.
Castillo needed time and encouragement to accept the value of living with a disability.
Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury SCI are at risk of attempting suicide; this risk is increased by the presence of a psychiatric diagnosis. There is a crucial need for risk assessment and psychological intervention for individuals with mental health issues following SCI.The Spanish euthanasia law is similar to the Canadian euthanasia law since it only requires that a person has "a serious chronic and disabling illness."
Euthanasia is not a treatment for people experiencing suicidal ideation, but rather supportive and life-affirming programs. Euthanasia was not a form of freedom for Noelia Castillo but was and abandoned to death.
The Spanish euthanasia law is similar to Canada's law which allows people with mental illness to be killed, if they have another health condition. People with disabilities who are live with mental illness are not protected from euthanasia, even when they have suicidal ideation.
Alex Schadenberg Executive Director, Euthanasia Prevention Coalition
Kelsi Sheren produced on excellent podcast on the comments by Pierre Poilievre and Joe Rogan on (MAiD) euthanasia in Canada during their March 20 discussion. I am sharing parts of Sheren's comments.
In the podcast Sheren explains what Poilievre got wrong with the euthanasia.
Rogan brings up his concern that MAiD now represents 5% of all deaths in Canada. Poilievre responds by saying that he supports "choice" but his concern is with MAiD for kids or people with mental illness alone.Sheren then states, are
you not supposed to be a Conservative, are you not supposed to believe
that killing is wrong. Sheren then says, apparently your not and this
sucks for several reasons. Thank you Kelsi. Sheren continues.
Our society is so sick, our doctors are so messed up, our healthcare is so broken that we cannot allow for MAiD to exist in our country.
What about the more than 400 non-compliant deaths in Ontario?
What about the Ontario Coroner reports and Dr Ramona Coelho's research?
There are so many people slipping through the cracks and to sit there and say that we should allow people to have the right to be killed by a doctor. Pierre, are you not a Conservative?
This is not OK. Poilievre has clearly not been briefed on the numbers and he was not clearly briefed on Kiano's story, even though he pretended he knew about it.
I am concerned about this because Poilievre just said the one thing that's going to allow the death cult to push forward, that even the Conservative leader thinks its perfectly OK to allow people to die by MAiD.
What about Track 2 MAiD? What about Track 1 MAiD? What about Mrs B (Ontario Coroner's report) that we know was killed the same day after requesting palliative and hospice care and was denied the right to an actual peaceful death. When you promote MAiD, this is how the slippery slope turns into an elevator shaft.
What about Track 2 (Euthanasia for people who are not terminally ill, but have a chronic condition)? Most people are dying by Track 1 because it is very easy to become Track 1. You only have to say I am no longer eating and drinking and go from Track 2 to Track 1.
Do you see how the slippery slope works or do we just not care?
Also, what about the disabled community?
Does Pierre not understand that even the United Nations stated that Track 2 is dangerous and needs to be repealed immediately. But Pierre seems to think that's fine.
Pierre said I'm actually just concerned about the mentally ill and the children, but how do you think we got here Pierre?
Because we allowed a policy that ends people's lives. Because we allowed it, you cannot decide what walks through.
So now we have a Conservative leader who opposes MAiD for the children and the mentally ill but forgets the slippery slope in the middle which is your disability, homeless, addicts, etc.
What about Kayla Pollock, or Roger Foley who is living in a London Ontario hospital and just has a degenerative disorder, but the hospital has offered him MAiD.
Foley is not a mature minor and he doesn't have a mental illness so he should be offered MAiD?
Rogan then mentions that he has a friend who has gone to Oregon to die by assisted suicide.
Sheren explains that Oregon has been doing assisted suicide since the 90's and is one of the only states that does not have a residency requirement. They are not actually talking about how the assisted suicide drugs work.
In Oregon they give you a cup full of poison but they cannot guarantee you a peaceful death. In Oregon, the longest time of death is 137 hours.
I understand wanting someone to leave this life with control and autonomy. That is what hospice and palliative care is for. That is what real support is for.
I hear what you are saying, but our society cannot handle the responsibility of killing because people will abuse and coerce the system.
This is how this stuff gets passed. They pull on the heartstrings.
We all die, but that is what palliative care and hospice is for. Why are we not better funding palliative care and hospice? Why are we not funding better research for ALS, Alzheimer's or Dementia? Because we are going to euthanize you anyway.
Joe Rogan then says - there is a place for it.
Sheren responds that there isn't a place for it because we have cases of coercion and people being pushed into this.
Rogan then states that Kiano died by euthanasia because of seasonal depression.
Sheren responds that Kiano did not qualify to be killed because of seasonal depression, Kiano qualified because he was a diabetic who was losing his vision and he also had seasonal depression.
Rogan and Pierre don't even know the story. Kiano had multiple concussion when he was 17 and that affects depression. Kiano also had addictive behaviours. He was using drugs along with a pharmaceutical cocktail.
Rogan asks Pierre, who allowed that to happen?
Sheren responds, it was Dr Ellen Wiebe at the Willow Clinic in Vancouver. Canadians will doctor shop to find a doctor willing to kill.
Kiano was slated to die in 2022 by Dr Tepper at MAiDhouse, the killing facility in Ontario but his mother prevented that killing.
Does Pierre not want to address that there are places in Canada that only kill people? They are funded by tax dollars.
Rogan said: Who didn't counsel this young boy, who didn't give him a hug?
His mother gave him his hugs. His mother Margaret fought his whole life to give her son from
the system. His family stood up for Kiano, trying to him help.
Rogan said: Who didn't tell him about diet and exercise and changing his surroundings, his lifestyle?
If Pierre knew about this case he would have known that all of these things were tried. His mother fought for him, he went into support.
The doctors didn't address his head injury and they didn't address his drug abuse issue.
If the incoming prime minister candidate doesn't know the story then he should just say it.
Pierre: You didn't say that Track 2 euthanasia should be stopped. You didn't say, Track 2 should be stopped but I accept Track 1 euthanasia. Stand on something.
You left the disabled out in the cold. You said for children and those with mental illness we shouldn't have MAiD but they have already killed people with mental illness. Do you not know that?
Rogan said: Your going to end this beautiful life because of seasonal depression?
Sheren once again explains that he was not killed because of seasonal depression. Pierre had the opportunity to state what the system did to this kid and his family. Pierre had the opportunity to be prime ministerial, but he didn't.
Sheren said: How am I supposed to support a Conservative candidate who is good with allowing MAiD for Track 2 when the United Nations has even said that this is a problem.
When you misrepresent cases, like Kiano to score some form of points, that is reckless as hell.
Then to claim that was true is even worse. Once the MAiD system exists, it is not about should we, it is about who qualifies next.
Sheren then explains that she has been where Kiano was and has dealt with people who are where Kiano was, but she doesn't tell them that they should die.
For the issues that matter to me, Kelsi Sheren, my family, my friends, my community, the disabled community, the mentally ill, the people that struggle, the veterans... he just cosigned this law by saying there should be an option and the only one he has a problem with is mental illness and children.
What is needed is better research, better palliative care and more caring.
Sheren continues: We have doctors playing God. Ellen Wiebe is one of them.
Joe, she killed him in a funeral home, not for seasonal depression, and Pierre should have known that or said, I don't know.
Netherlands 2025 report: 10,341 reported euthanasia deaths representing 6% of all deaths.
Alex Schadenberg Executive Director, Euthanasia Prevention Coalition
The Netherlands Times reported on March 26, 2026 that in 2025 there were 10,341 reported euthanasia deaths representing 6% of all deaths. Reported euthanasia deaths were up by 3.8% from 9,958 in 2024.
The article indicated that there were:
174 reported euthanasia deaths for people with mental disorders which was down by 45 from 2024. Unlike 2024, none of the deaths involved children.
499 reported euthanasia deaths for dementia which was up by 17% from 427 in 2024. In 2025 there were 11 cases where the person was not mentally competent to request euthanasia.
475 reported euthanasia deaths for multiple age-related conditions which was up by 20% from 397 in 2024.
278 reported euthanasia deaths for "other" conditions which was up by 20% from 232 in 2024. "Other" conditions is not defined.
In 2025, there were 7 deaths that did not fulfill the "due care" criteria and were investigated, which was up from 6 deaths in 2024.
The number of Netherlands euthanasia deaths may be much higher.
In July 2025 I wrote an article about the Netherlands 2021 death study which found that the actual number of 2021 euthanasia deaths was 22% higher than reported and there were 517 (LAWER) euthanasia deaths (euthanasia without request or consent).
The study was done by examining a random cross-section of all deaths, and based on the data projecting the actual number of euthanasia deaths. Previous Netherlands death studies also indicated that approximately 20 - 23% of all euthanasia deaths are unreported.
On November 27, 2025 I reported on the Netherlands euthanasia bill that was being promoted by Stichting Levenseinderegie (Ending Life Management Foundation) that would eliminate all of the "restrictions" in the Netherlands euthanasia law.
Considering that in 2025 there were 499 reported euthanasia deaths for people with dementia, 475 euthanasia deaths for people with multiple age-related conditions, I would suggest that Stichting Levenseinderegie are achieving their goal.
In April 2025 I reported that the Netherlands D66 political party wants to expand the euthanasia law to make it easier for people with dementia to be killed by euthanasia. It is sad that in 2025 499 people with dementia were killed by euthanasia.
Canada
has not conducted a random cross-section death study, as the Netherlands has done every 5 years. Therefore we do not know how many euthanasia deaths are not being reported or how many euthanasia deaths are done without request or consent in
Canada.
Canada, and the world, have much to learn about the Netherlands failed euthanasia experiment. Sadly, Canada has followed the Netherlands lead.
It is my hope that people will wake up and stop killing people.
Alex Schadenberg Executive Director, Euthanasia Prevention Coalition
Yes, the title is correct.
In 2023, an Autistic teenager was killed by euthanasia in the Netherlands. Some people might not care, but I have an autistic son.
This is not about
terminal illness or uncontrolled suffering, not that I would agree to
kill a person who is terminally ill or who needs pain and symptom
management. This was a young autistic person with sensory issues who
experiences the world in a different way. This killing of an
autistic person, is based on a eugenic ideology.
I oppose killing people but it is a eugenic ideology that allows a psychiatrist to kill an autistic person by lethal poison. To make a decision that life with autism is worse than death, and so much so that the psychiatrist kills the person is to believe that some lives are not worth living. This eugenic ideology is very dangerous.
The boy, aged between 16 and 18, had described his life as “joyless.” He’d struggled with anxiety and mood-related problems, and where he fit in, in the world. Oversensitive to stimuli, “every day was an ordeal he had to get through,” according to the latest annual report from the Netherlands’ regional euthanasia death review committees. “In the final weeks before his death, he lay in bed the whole time.”
Kirkey reports that young man's doctor was convinced that there was no prospect for improvement. As a father of a son with autism, I consider this statement to be ridiculous. Yes, the young man would always be autistic, but autism is based on his sensory perception. As a human, he would have difficult times, but with good care he would change.
In her July 2023 article, Meghan Schrader, an autistic woman who now works as a disability instructor in Texas, explains how she went through an incredibly difficult and psychotic time. We are fortunate that Meghan didn't live in the Netherlands and wasn't being treated by a eugenic psychiatrist who was willing to kill her.
Dr Sonu Gaind, a professor of medicine at the University of Toronto and a past president of the Canadian Psychiatric Association was interviewed by Kirkey. She reports:
The
Dutch experience “should be taken as a wake-up call,” said Dr. Sonu
Gaind, a professor of medicine at the University of Toronto and a past
president of the Canadian Psychiatric Association.
“The
threshold (for assisted death) in Canada is actually lower than the
Netherlands,” Gaind said. “If MAID for sole mental illness is opened up
in Canada, the numbers would significantly exceed what you see in the
Netherlands.”
Charles Lane recently published an analysis, in the Atlantic, concerning the growth of euthanasia for psychiatric reasons. Kirkey explained:
While most euthanasia deaths in the Netherlands involve people with
medical conditions such as cancer, 219 people whose suffering was
largely due to one or more psychiatric illnesses died an assisted death
in 2024, up from 88 in 2020.
Of
the 2024 deaths, 111 involved people aged 30 to 60, 78 involved people
60 and over, and 30 deaths were among people aged 18 to 30. In 2023, two psychiatric euthanasia deaths involved a minor between the ages of 12 and 18. The teen with autism was one of them.
The Canadian parliament recently established another parliament (AMAD) euthanasia committee to once again examine the implementation of euthanasia for mental illness alone. I think that the Netherlands experience with euthanasia for mental illness alone is enough to tell us to reverse course and to not go there.
Gaind is sadly correct. There would be a higher percentage of euthanasia deaths for mental illness in Canada than in the Netherlands. The Netherlands define euthanasia as a "last resort" procedure, whereas in Canada, people can request and be killed by euthanasia without even try treatments that might result in the person getting better.
Belgian 2025 report: There were 4,486 reported euthanasia deaths up by 12.4% in 2024.
Alex Schadenberg Executive Director, Euthanasia Prevention Coalition
The European Institute of Bioethics (IEB-EIB) reported that the 2025 Belgian euthanasia report indicated that there were 4,486 reported euthanasia deaths in 2025 representing a 12.4% increase from 2024. According the IEB-EIB (Google translated from French):
On March 20, the Belgian Federal Commission for the Control and Evaluation of Euthanasia (CFCEE) released figures on euthanasia cases reported for 2025.
The number of officially recorded euthanasia deaths last year reached a new record: 4,486 were reported to the Commission. This represents a 12.4% increase compared to 2024, a 51% increase over three years, and almost a doubling in just five years.
Euthanasia now accounts for 4% of all deaths registered in Belgium, and this upward trend could intensify, judging by the reasons given on euthanasia registration forms.
Multiple pathologies, the second most frequently cited condition after cancer, have increased by 67% in two years and now represent nearly a third of all reported euthanasia cases. More specifically, the proportion of euthanasia done on individuals who were not terminally ill due to multiple chronic conditions has literally increased tenfold in five years, rising from 5.9% to 57.3%.
These percentages, which have been steadily increasing since the decriminalization of this practice in Belgium, raising serious questions: has old age become a sufficient reason to resort to euthanasia?
Multiple chronic conditions: a vague category akin to the weariness of living.
In its latest biennial report published in 2025, the Control Commission highlighted this continued rise in euthanasia based on the criterion of multiple chronic conditions and explained that:
"this percentage will continue to increase, as multiple chronic conditions are associated with the aging process that patients undergo."
Indeed, multiple chronic conditions, according to the Commission, refer to "a combination of conditions caused by several chronic illnesses that are progressing towards a terminal stage." In practice, these conditions can include end-stage heart failure, hemiplegia due to a stroke, as well as cognitive impairment, vision or hearing loss, rheumatoid arthritis, or incontinence.
While some of these conditions are life-threatening, they primarily affect quality of life, which explains why, in 2025, more than half of the euthanasia deaths in this category (57.3%) were done when death was not expected in the short term. Is the fear of dependency becoming sufficient to shorten life?
To understand what justifies euthanasia based on these conditions, that do not directly threaten life, one must bear in mind the subjective logic followed by the Oversight Commission in its verification of the legality of euthanasia, according to which the patient's perception of suffering is considered authoritative.
In cases of multiple chronic conditions, the chronic progression of illnesses extends over several years and can cause significant psychological suffering, according to the Commission. Based on the scientific research of Marianne Dees, the Commission reports that:
"feelings of hopelessness, dependence on care, fear of further deterioration, and fear of increased physical suffering are determining factors in requests for euthanasia."
In this context, it is also understandable that in 86% of all reported cases of euthanasia, both physical and psychological suffering were mentioned simultaneously. This finding underscores the vital need for better support for the elderly and at the end of life in general, so that weariness of living and fear of dependency do not become sufficient reasons to shorten a person's life.
The IEB-EIB refer to reported euthanasia deaths since previous studies indicate that there is a significant number of euthanasia that are simply not reported. Therefore the actual number of euthanasia deaths is likely much higher.
Some recent articles on Belgium's experience with euthanasia.
Belgian bioethics committee supports eugenic euthanasia (Read).
Belgium debates expanding euthanasia to people with dementia (Read).
Almost 4000 reported Belgian euthanasia deaths in 2024 (Read).
The President of Belgium's largest health insurance fund promotes euthanasia as an answer to healthcare funding. (Read).
Belgian doctor completes euthanasia with a pillow (Read).
Alex Schadenberg Executive Director, Euthanasia Prevention Coalition.
I have more great news from Slovenia.
The Slovenian Supreme Court has upheld the results of the assisted suicide referendum that rejected the Slovenian assisted suicide law.
The Slovenian parliament legalized assisted suicide in July 2025. After the passing of the poison bill, a group of citizens organized by Aleš Primc, of the Slovenian Voice for Children and Families, collected 46,000 to require a referendum on the assisted suicide bill.
Following the successful referendum vote, a court challenge was launched claiming irregularities in the referendum campaign.
On March 24, 2026, the Slovenian Supreme Court rejected the challenge to the referendum results and decided that there was no proof that any alleged irregularities had a significant impact on the vote and its outcome.
I am convinced that a miracle happened. In recent years, the media often published manipulative emotional stories in favor of assisted dying and polls in the final week suggested less than 30% of the public opposed it. We won the referendum with 53.46%.
Alex Schadenberg Executive Director, Euthanasia Prevention Coalition
Robert Clarke, a lawyer and the director of advocacy with ADF International was published in the Federalist on March 23, 2026 with his article: Around the World, Assisted Suicide Laws Are Losing Support. Clarke outlines how campaigns to legalize euthanasia and/or assisted suicide have lost their luster and a new direction has begun to begin rolling back laws that already exist.
Clarke writes:
Last week, Scotland resolutely rejected assisted suicide. Alberta announced major new legislation to protect individuals from the practice. And the clock is ticking in the United Kingdom’s House of Lords on a bill that would legalize the practice in England and Wales.
Clarke explains that the recent defeat of Scotland's assisted suicide bill by a vote of 69 to 57 happened with cross-party opposition to the bill. Clarke also refers to the introduction in Alberta of Bill 18, a government bill that will use provincial jurisdiction to institute greater protections for Albertans concerning euthanasia.
Alberta Bill 18 will:
require the individual to have a 12 month terminal prognosis, thus preventing Track 2 euthanasia approvals. Track 2 refers to euthanasia for people who are not terminally ill.
prevent the expansion of euthanasia to people with mental illness alone,
prevent the expansion of euthanasia to "mature minors", people who cannot consent and prevent euthanasia by advanced request,
prevent out of province referrals,
require the assessor to contact other practitioners who have cared for the patient, before approval.
require (MAiD) euthanasia practitioners to receive specific training,
prevent health care practitioners from introducing euthanasia, without a request,
require Regulatory Colleges to sanction practitioners who violate the act.
provide conscience rights by enabling practitioners to refuse to participate or provide assessments for (MAiD) euthanasia,
enable institutions to refuse to participate or provide assessments for euthanasia,
create an exclusion zone for euthanasia around an institution that refuses to participate,
require practitioners who refuse to participate or provide assessments to provide information to patients wanting to access euthanasia.
Clarke writes:
Over the last four years, deaths in Alberta from Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) regime increased by 109 percent. In her announcement, Alberta’s premier, Danielle Smith, was clear that the proposed law is “about protecting vulnerable Albertans.” As the federal government seeks to expand MAID across the country, including by moving to allow assisted suicide solely on the basis of mental health concerns, Alberta is drawing a line to protect its most vulnerable. If passed, the Safeguards for Last Resort Termination of Life Act would prohibit MAID for minors and when the sole condition is mental illness, in addition to introducing other key protections and delineating a right to conscientious objection.
Clarke maintains that safeguards cannot make euthanasia or assisted suicide safe but Alberta Bill 18 is headed in the right direction by dealing with some of the most egregious parts of Canada's euthanasia law.
The key factors as to why euthanasia and assisted suicide have lost their luster are the radical implementation and expansion of Canada's euthanasia law and the incredible referendum overturning the Slovenian assisted suicide law. In fact, Canada's euthanasia law had a direct affect on Slovenia's successful referendum campaign.
Canada origally legalized euthanasia for people who were terminally ill and suffering. Canadians were told the the law would only be a last resort, but from the beginning the language of the law lacked definition which immediately led to a type of expansion.
In less than 5 years Canada expanded the law legally by removing the requirement that a person be terminally ili, eliminated the "reflection period" for those who are terminally ill to allow a same-day death, eliminating the requirement that a person be capable of consenting at the time of the killing and allowing euthanasia for mental illness alone. Parliament delayed euthanasia for mental illness alone. It is now scheduled to begin on March 17, 2027.
The euthanasia stories from Canada have had an incredible effect on the international euthanasia debate. The world asks how a 26-year-old diabetic man with a serious history with mental health issue, who lives in Ontario, could be killed by euthanasia in Vancouver BC after not being approved to be killed by doctors in his own province.
The world asks how a man with a back disability can be approved for euthanasia, even though he is only asking to be killed because of housing issues. The same question comes up concerning an Ontario woman with Multiple Chemical Sensitivities who was living in social housing. She was killed by euthanasia even though she actually needed suitable housing.
These are only a few of the incredible number of stories from Canada that are changing the international perception of euthanasia and assisted suicide. For those who do not oppose killing people, euthanasia and assisted suicide are becoming an interesting theoretical experiment without an effective practical implementation.
The incredible referendum campaign that overturned Slovenia's assisted suicide law is another key factor. Here is an article I wrote about this campaign. (Read article).
Slovenia is the first country to legalize assisted suicide and then overturn the law. We all now how difficult it is to run a referendum campaign, but the Slovenian campaign stuck to their talking points and did not avoid the truth of what euthanasia and assisted suicide actually are,
The average person continues to have an aversion to killing people. So long as we focus on what euthanasia and assisted suicide actually are, we can win the debate. When become afraid of saying the truth and argue that euthanasia and assisted suicide are not necessary, that means that it is OK but not necessary. Why isn't it necessary?
Killing is not only unnecessary but it is always wrong to give medical practitioners the right in law to kill you. Also, once legal it cannot be controlled. Killing is contagious.
Register in advance to watch the free online screening of the powerful Life Worth Living film on Monday, March 30 at 7 pm (Eastern Time). (Registration Link)
The Life Worth Living film features stories from people who have been directly affected, doctors who explain their experiences, and people who are working to prevent euthanasia in Canada.
Register in advance for this online event: (Zoom registration link). After registering you will receive a viewing link.
EPC has had multiple online screenings and many groups have sponsored screenings of the Life Worth Living film. We encourage groups and individuals to arrange a screening of the Life Worth Living film. Contact EPC at info@epcc.ca
Life Worth Living was a finalist at the Cannes World Film Festival and is being considered by multiple film festivals.
Life Worth Living is 60 minutes long. After the completion of the broadcast we will have time for a discussion.
Life Worth Living features:
Alicia Duncan, whose mother died by euthanasia with conditions based on mental health,
Kelsi Sheren, a Canadian military veteran. CEO, best selling Author of the book - Brass & Unity, TedX speaker and host of the Kelsi Sheren perspective.
Roger Foley
Roger Foley, a Canadian man living with a significant disability who has been pressured by hospital staff to request euthanasia.
Dr David D'Souza, Ontario pain specialist.
Dr Catherine Ferrier, Quebec Gerontologist and a leader of the Physicians' Alliance against Euthanasia,
Dr Will Johnston, family physician and leader of Euthanasia Resistance BC
Kathy Matusiak Costa, Executive Director of Compassionate Community Care,
Alex Schadenberg, (myself), author, keynote speaker, International leader opposing euthanasia and assisted suicide.
The Euthanasia Prevention Coalition needs your help:
Arrange to have Life Worth Living shown in your community. Contact us at: info@epcc.ca
You may want a speaker at the event to lead a discussion. Contact us at: info@epcc.ca
Register for the free online Being With My Story Visitor Volunteer Training program on April 15 and 16 and become involved with visiting people in your community who are elderly and/or living alone.
This special training is provided by Compassionate Community Care (CCC) and is co-hosted with CCC Executive Director, Kathy Matusiak Costa and Alex Schadenberg, EPC Executive Director.
Alex Schadenberg
Caring for people. Gain the confidence to journey with those who are lonely, socially isolated, sick, or dying, to renew their hope and purpose in living until they die.
The Training Workshop is composed of two sessions, each session is two hours held on:
Wednesday April 15 (7 pm - 9 pm) (EST)
Thursday April 16 (7 pm - 9 pm) (EST)
With Kathy Matusiak Costa, Executive Director of Compassionate Community Care, and Alex Schadenberg, Executive Director of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition.
By Gordon Friesen President, Euthanasia Prevention Coalition
I think it is fair to say that the world-wide
euthanasia/assisted-suicide/medical-homicide debate has recently entered a new
phase.
For as long as I can remember, a relentless
click-clack, click-clack, click-clack, political ratchet sound had signalled
"progress" in one direction alone: more legal jurisdictions; wider
eligibility; increasingly limited access to real care.
Our victories were counted in the defeat of euthanasia and assisted suicide bills. And, even while celebrating, we knew that the same people
would be back, next year, in the same states or countries, with the same bills (or perhaps
something even worse).
In the last few years, huge chunks of cultural
geography seemed poised to totter all at once, notably including the entire
British diaspora of UK, Wales, Scotland, the Chanel Islands, Australia, New
Zealand, and of course, Canada. France too, had lately joined the contest,
along with the rest of Southern Europe. And in the US the "progressive" bastions
of Illinois, and New York, finally managed to eke out a long awaited pro-death
majority.
But now, it would seem that the winds may indeed be
changing. For although its former satellites --Australia, Canada, and more--
have indeed forged ahead in radical fashion, The UK itself including all its
main constituents (England, Scotland) has not. And while France has been
teetering for years, against all lucid prediction: it teeters still.
And then something amazing occurred. Slovenian legislators
legalized euthanasia in July 2025,according to the same "the fix is in" international playbook
that we see advanced elsewhere. But the Slovenian people suddenly rose up and
reversed that decision with a binding referendum, in November of the same year!
Apparently, this tiny victory, in a nation of only 2
million souls, is destined to be recorded in history as that first
infinitesimal crack in an apparently indestructible wall, which clearly
foretells (for those who can read the signs) a future collapse of the entire
structure. For in this instance, a euthanasia legalizing initiative was not
merely postponed, but frankly rolled back.
To be clear on this point: unlike any number of
American States, Slovenians will not face a new euthanasia initiative next
year. And this, in exactly the same way that an overturned US Supreme Court
decision never results in new legislation, to the same effect, for at least a
generation.
Quite frankly, I think most people assumed (or at
least feared) that this victory would be a one-off, and that the death-cult
steam-roller would continue unabated as before.
But now we have Alberta, one of ten Canadian Provinces
which suddenly says:
"No, Canada may render an extended practice of
legal euthanasia, but the Province of Alberta will limit such
practice within the bounds of public healthcare."
Once again, as in Slovenia, what is already legal (and
in the Canadian context what had been actual practice going back five years)
will be halted. Not a prevention. A roll-back!
In a little while it will be appropriate to say
something more specific about the meaning of Alberta Bill 18 for Canada, and
especially, for other Canadian Provinces. But for today, I would simply like to
make two international remarks.
First: it can be done!
Defeating a Bill in your jurisdiction is not
necessarily a temporary victory. It is possible that you have stopped this
madness permanently. And furthermore --just as in Slovenia and Alberta-- even
losing is not the end of rational hope. Evil policy can actually be reversed.
We have the proof!
My second remark, however, is more sobering: The
popping of champagne corks, that we hear in Canada today, is to celebrate
rolling back the demented policy of that nation in only one of ten Provinces;
and even there, only to the original state of euthanasia law in 2016, which was
then the most radical in the world.
The number one lesson of Alberta, in the US and around
the world, is therefore this:
If you do not wish to find yourself in a similar
situation to that described, it is imperative to invest yourself, now, in the
struggle to prevent any legalization, whatsoever, in whatever jurisdiction you
cherish as your home.
