Monday, October 5, 2026

Christa Pike didn't die by lethal injection. What happened?

Alex Schadenberg
Executive Director, Euthanasia Prevention Coalition

Last week I reported on the failed Tennessee lethal injection execution of Christa Pike. In my article I explained how the concerns with failed execution deaths also apply to failed euthanasia or assisted suicide deaths.

Dr Joel Zivot, who is an anesthesiologist and intensive care physician and a medical expert for Ms. Pike’s lawyers, leading up to her execution explained, what happened to Pike, in an article published by the New York Times on October 4, 2026.

Zivot explains what happened to Christa Pike:
On Wednesday night, Christa Pike lay strapped to a gurney at Riverbend Maximum Security Institution in Nashville while the State of Tennessee injected pentobarbital, a sedative that is lethal in high doses, into her veins. When the first dose did not kill her, the execution team gave her a second. At one point, she told the room her arm felt as if it were about to burst. She was nearly correct. More than an hour after the procedure began, an ambulance was called. She was severely injured, but still alive.

By Thursday, Ms. Pike was in critical condition, receiving what her lawyers called lifesaving care. In a matter of hours, she had gone from a prisoner the state was trying to kill to a patient doctors were trying to save. As of this writing, she is unconscious. She is intubated and cannot breathe without a mechanical ventilator.
Zivot continues: 
I reviewed her medical records and warned her team that she had medical conditions that could lead to a painful and cruel death by lethal injection.

Tennessee has not explained what went wrong on Wednesday night, but the evidence so far points in one direction. Ms. Pike has small veins, which make it more difficult to insert an intravenous line. After the pentobarbital was administered, her arms turned purple. Her lawyers report blistering and burning at the injection sites. This suggests that at least some of the pentobarbital entered the tissue of her arms rather than her bloodstream because the intravenous lines failed.

Gov. Bill Lee has said that as far as he knows, the Department of Correction followed its protocol exactly. I take him at his word. That is the problem. Lethal injection failures are not glitches; they are features of the process.
Zivot explains how the lethal injection drugs, that are used in executions, work. It must be noted, that similar drugs are used in Canada for euthanasia.
Pentobarbital is highly alkaline, like bleach, and when injected into tissue, it causes a severe chemical burn. In Ms. Pike’s case, it appears that enough of the drug reached her brain to sedate her deeply, but not enough to stop her breathing. I cannot rule out that the drug itself was degraded, because Tennessee, like other death penalty states, does not disclose how it buys and prepares it. This is a state whose own independent review found that none of the drugs prepared for the seven people it executed between 2018 and 2022 had been fully tested.
Zivot challenges medicalizing killing:
Ever since Oklahoma became the first state to adopt lethal injection in 1977, prison officials have tried to make executions appear like medicine: There are gurneys, IV lines and heart monitors. But lethal injection is a sinister impersonation of the medical profession. There is no patient, no consent and no healing purpose. Even the drug is miscast. In the hands of the physician, pentobarbital is a medicine. I use drugs like it regularly in my intensive care unit to sedate critically ill patients. In the hands of the state, pentobarbital is a poison. Pentobarbital is not a painkiller, and when it is injected by the state, no one can say when a prisoner stops feeling pain.

This medical impersonation hides a great deal. I have reviewed the autopsies of more than 200 people executed by lethal injection. In most of them, the prisoners’ lungs were heavy with fluid, often with froth in the airways. These are signs of pulmonary edema, which suggests that the prisoners could have felt as if they were drowning, even if some looked peaceful as they were dying.
Zivot comments on other recent lethal injection executions:
After Tennessee executed Byron Black last year, his autopsy found the same thing. Witnesses reported that he moaned and said, “It’s hurt­ing so bad,” during the execution. In May, Tennessee’s execution team spent about an hour trying and failing to place an intravenous line in Tony Carruthers. In desperation, and because the state’s execution protocol said they could, they tried to insert a central line in Mr. Carruthers’s chest. That failed too, leaving Mr. Carruthers deeply shaken and bleeding from multiple puncture wounds. While aspects of Ms. Pike’s case are unique, the cruelty she experienced in the execution chamber is not an aberration.
Zivot comments on the outcome for Christa Pike:
Consider what a hospital team faces when a patient like Ms. Pike arrives. In my intensive care unit, a massive overdose is a familiar emergency. We secure the airway, support the blood pressure and monitor the brain. We watch an arm swollen by drug use to check for dying tissue and for pressure that can choke off its blood supply. Dying muscle cells leach poison into the bloodstream and deliver it into the kidneys. We count the minutes that passed before anyone called for help, because the brain keeps that count too.

It may take months to fully understand the extent of the damage that has been done to Ms. Pike’s body. Given that Ms. Pike was taken to the hospital over an hour after the lethal drug was administered, it is very possible that she sustained permanent brain injury. She most likely faces a very long road to recovery.

No one in the hospital where Ms. Pike is being treated would call what happened to her a medical procedure. To them it is a poisoning, and she is now a patient entitled to health care. Same body, same drug, same night: In one room it was called an execution; in the next it was treated as an injury. The doctors caring for Ms. Pike now owe her everything medicine can give. If they succeed, they will hand her back to the state that may try to kill her again.
Zivot ends his article by commenting on lethal injection execution:
The Supreme Court has ruled that the Constitution does not guarantee a painless execution, a decision states such as Tennessee cite to defend their lethal injection protocols. Very well. Then states should stop telling the public that lethal injection is clinical and not cruel. The illusion does not fool death row prisoners. I was a medical expert in three separate execution cases in Tennessee over the past 10 years. In each instance, the prisoner elected to die by the electric chair instead of by lethal injection.

Some states have already turned to nitrogen gas and firing squads. Christa Pike asked to be hanged. I do not endorse those methods. But they, at least, do not pretend to be medicine.

The deeper question is whether a state that executes its citizens is willing to look at what it is doing. Lethal injection was designed so that it would not have to. It puts the violence behind a sheet and a saline drip, and behind curtains that close the moment something goes wrong. After the pentobarbital failed to stop Ms. Pike’s heart, prison staff closed the curtains separating the execution chamber from witnesses for nearly an hour. The blinds could not conceal what had happened. A woman left the death chamber in an ambulance, and the only people who could help her were doctors.
Thank you Dr Zivot for your article explaining what happened to Christa Pike.

The concerns associated with lethal injection executions are the same concerns associated with lethal poison assisted suicide deaths.

In Oregon, where assisted suicide has been legal for more than 25 years, the longest time from ingestion to death in the 2025 assisted suicide report was 123 hours (more than 5 days). 

Deaths that take 123 hours are not peaceful or dignified deaths. But 123 hours to die by lethal poison is not an outlier. In 2023 the longest time of death was 137 hours (almost 6 days).

There may be many more assisted suicide deaths that took several days to be completed but the Oregon assisted suicide data only indicates the longest time of death. 

Clearly assisted suicide deaths can be inhumane.

The issues concerning assisted suicide also extend to euthanasia, which involves similar lethal injection drugs.

The story about the euthanasia (MAiD) death of Brigitte Stegemann (83) who lived near Belleville Ontario presented similar concerns. The Daily Mail reported:
Once back inside the home, the nurse started the IV, Kranendonk alleges. ...

The nurse struggled to insert the IV into Stegemann's right arm, and ended up piercing her repeatedly with the needle before attempting her left arm.

Kranendonk remembers in graphic detail the copious amount of blood, which made the whole procedure feel strangely unprofessional.

'She's asking us to hand her things, to flush out the needle. So we're now a part of this. She's asking us to grab things for her, and to hold things for her.

'This nurse is not wearing gloves. There's blood all over her hands, there's blood all over the place,' she says, horrified by the memory.
The problem begins with the concept that it is acceptable to kill people.

If death by capital punishment can be cruel and unusual punishment then killing people by lethal poison for assisted suicide or euthanasia is also cruel, inhumane and dehumanizing.

EPC Press Conference: Vote YES on Bill C-218



Media Advisory (Link to Media Advisory)

Alex Schadenberg
Bill C-218, the bill to prevent MAiD for Mental Illness as a sole criteria, will go to a vote on October 7.

Bilingual Press Conference: Wednesday, October 7, at 11 am

Parliamentary Press Gallery (Ottawa) - Room 135B West Block

The Euthanasia Prevention Coalition (EPC) is hosting a press conference at the Parliamentary Press Gallery in Ottawa on October 7 at 11 am.


Dr Normand-Rivest
Speakers include: 

  • Dr Laurence Normand-Rivest, is a Montreal family physician who cares for geriatric patients and provides in-home palliative care,
  • Dr Paul Saba is a family physician in Lachine Québec who has personal experience with caring for people with mental health related trauma,
  • Odile Marcotte, a retired professor from the Université du Québec à Montréal and a former deputy director of the Centre de recherches mathématiques, and a EPC Board member.
  • Alex Schadenberg, Executive Director of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition

Dr Paul Saba
Dr Normand-Rivest and Dr Saba will focus on their professional and clinical experience while Odile Marcotte and Alex Schadenberg will focus on the issues related to Bill C-218.

On June 17, 2026; the report of the Special Joint Committee on Medical Assistance in Dying (AMAD): Mental Disorder as the Sole Underlying Medical Condition: A Complex and Challenging Conversation Among Canadians - decided that the Government of Canada should amend the Criminal Code to indefinitely exclude persons whose sole underlying medical condition is a mental illness from eligibility for medical assistance in dying.

Odile Marcotte
The language of Bill C-218 accomplishes this recommendation.

One of the reasons for the (AMAD) committee recommendation was that leading psychiatrists in Canada said that it was impossible to determine if a mental illness or condition was irremediable.

For more information contact Alex Schadenberg at: 519-851-1434 or email: office@epcc.ca

To participate in-person or by zoom contact the Parliamentary Press Gallery at: pressres2@parl.gc.ca.

Seuls les membres de la tribune parlementaire peuvent participer à la période de questions et réponses, qui aura lieu sur place et via Zoom. Les médias qui ne sont pas membres de la tribune parlementaire peuvent communiquer avec pressres2@parl.gc.ca pour obtenir l'accès temporaire. 

The Euthanasia Prevention Coalition has almost 60,000 supporters from different political beliefs who unite in opposition to MAiD (euthanasia).

Friday, October 2, 2026

Outcry Grows over Canada’s 100,000 and Counting ‘Assistance in Dying’ Killings

Alex Schadenberg
Executive Director, Euthanasia Prevention Coalition

Dan Hart wrote an article that was published in the Washington Stand on September 29, 2026 about Canada's euthanasia law. Hart begins his article by commenting on Brigitte Stegemann (83) who was a grand mother and a Christian who recently died by euthanasia. Hart states:
In July, the family of 83-year-old Brigitte Stegemann, an assisted living resident in Belleville, Ontario, chronicled their anguish after the beloved grandmother was put to death by a doctor under highly controversial circumstances. Stegemann suffered from cognitive impairment, was hard of hearing, and was recently diagnosed with Stage 4 stomach cancer, although she had been responding well to treatment.
Stegemann originally said NO to (MAiD) euthanasia based on her Christian beliefs and was later approved for euthanasia. Stegemann answered the questions wrong, when she was questioned to determine her ability to consent, and yet the doctor decided that she was competent anyway.

Hart explains that Canada surpassed 100,000 total euthanasia deaths since legalization in April 2026 and the number of deaths continue to grow. Hart then reports me as stating in our interview:
Experts like Alex Schadenberg, who serves as executive director at the Canada-based Euthanasia Prevention Coalition, say that the reason the number of deaths has continued to escalate is because the criteria for being approved for an assisted death has continually expanded, as has the endorsement of the medical establishment.

“[T]he program’s gone crazy in Canada because the original law required that the person would have a terminal condition, and also that there had to be a waiting period, etc. — that was removed in 2021,” he explained during “Washington Watch” Monday. “… [N]ow you don’t have to be terminally ill. There’s often no waiting period. … The other thing is they’re selling it. … [E]very major hospital in Canada now has a MAiD team where they sell it. They’re the ones who sign you up. They’re also the ones who sell it. So they make sure people know that, ‘Oh, by the way, you have this medical condition, you probably qualify for MAiD.’ … And you see the numbers of deaths just going through the roof.”

Brigitte Stegemann and her granddaughter
I responded to further questions about Brigitte Stegemann:

In addition, Schadenberg highlighted how the safeguards that MAiD supposedly has against ethical abuses are in name only, which the case of Brigitte Stegemann put in stark relief.

“[Stegemann] was not capable of consenting,” he pointed out. “Nonetheless, she is dead. Now you have to understand how the law is written. The law says that the doctor must prove that the person is capable of consenting. … [Stegemann] got the questions wrong, but the doctor still declared that she was capable of consenting. But the law says the doctor only has to be of the opinion that the person fit the criteria of the law. So the law completely covers these people to kill you. … [When] you have such a wide open law, you’re going to get these type[s] of cases.”

Hart then asked me about people being coerced into euthanasia. I responded:

Schadenberg went on to emphasize how MAiD is being used to take advantage of a vulnerable population of elderly and others with severe health problems who can be easily coerced.

“Just this last weekend, we had another similar type case [where the] person who had cancer was saying no to euthanasia, they don’t want it. They’re saying it’s against their religious beliefs, but they’re being asked over and over and over again. … It affects you emotionally, it affects you psychologically. … So thankfully, this person once again has changed their mind and is being properly treated. But you know how this goes. These people are being almost pressured. It’s almost like coercion. The problem with this word ‘coercion’ is, what does it actually mean to be coerced? And I think in a lot of these cases, euthanasia is about coercion.”

Hart then asked me about the prospect of euthanasia for mental illness in Canada:

Schadenberg further lamented how lawmakers in Canada are currently debating whether to implement an additional expansion of MAiD for those with mental illnesses.

“[T]he law has passed already, and they have held it off until March of 2027. So right now, the legislators in Ottawa are debating a bill as to whether they’re going to reverse that or not,” he detailed. “So as of March of 2027, Canada is going to allow euthanasia for people with mental illness as a sole criteria. … This is insane what we’re doing. We’re talking about euthanasia for children. … [I]n the Netherlands [and] Belgium, they have that, and they’re talking about that in Canada. … When you allow killing, it’s very hard to say you can kill this person, but not that person, and that’s where we’re at. We need a massive reversal in our country.”

The problem with legalizing (medical homicide) euthanasia and/or assisted suicide is that these laws give medical professionals, literally, the right in law to kill you. Once you are dead you cannot change your mind or complain about the process.

Killing is never compassionate. 

Leslyn Lewis (MP): Compassion means caring for people.

Alex Schadenberg
Executive Director, Euthanasia Prevention Coalition

Dr Leslyn Lewis (MP)
Dr Leslyn Lewis, the Member of Parliament from Haldimand-Norfolk, responded to the comments by Pope Leo, while he was in Lourdes France, concerning euthanasia and assisted suicide. Dr Lewis stated on X:

Every human life has dignity, especially in moments of vulnerability.

Compassion means caring for people, supporting recovery, relieving suffering, and ensuring that no one feels abandoned when they are at their most vulnerable.

When people see death as the answer to social conditions such as poverty, homelessness or isolation, we should ask whether we have failed to provide the care and support they need to live with dignity.

As the Pope warns, we must not allow legalized death to become a substitute for compassion.
Thank you Dr Lewis for making this statement within Canada's difficult political reality. You always stand up for what you believe.

Thursday, October 1, 2026

Another botched execution in Tennessee. What about botched assisted deaths?

Alex Schadenberg
Executive Director
Euthanasia Prevention Coalition

On Wednesday, September 30, Tennessee had it's second consecutive botched lethal injection execution, this time it was Christa Pike.

The concerns related to botched execution deaths also apply to botched euthanasia and/or assisted suicide deaths.

Concerning Christa Pike, a report from WBIR news stated:
Pike's attorneys say she was given two doses of the lethal injection drug but she remained alive, though her condition is still unknown.

They filed an emergency motion at 8:26 p.m. CDT on Wednesday alleging the prolonged execution was causing Pike unnecessary physical and mental suffering and violated her constitutional protection against cruel and unusual punishment.

"Tonight the State of Tennessee once again failed to carry out a lawful execution," Pike's attorneys said. "We take no pleasure in being right, but the concerns raised by Ms. Pike proved to be true: difficult vein access, blown veins, degraded pentobarbital, no emergency medical care available when things inevitably go wrong, all under a protocol that remains veiled in secrecy. Christa is being treated at a nearby hospital. We have not been informed as to her condition."
WBIR reported that the Tennessee Department of Correction issued the following statement at on September 30th at 7 pm:
"The Tennessee Department of Correction followed every step of the State’s lawful, established execution protocol approved by the Attorney General’s Office. The lethal injection chemical in the protocol has consistently been effective, and the protocol does not allow for additional procedures beyond what was carried out this evening. Christa Pike has been transported to an off-site medical facility."
On September 29 I wrote about a group of medical professionals who sent a letter to Tennessee Governor Bill Lee stating that heathcare professionals should never assist with executions. The medical professionals were responding to the botched lethal injection execution of Tony Carruthers on May 21, 2026 in Tennessee.

The letter by the medical professionals concerning the botched execution of Tony Carruthers stated:
The horrifyingly botched attempt to execute Tony Carruthers on May 21 confirmed that TDOC is not presently able to conduct an execution that complies with the law, its own protocol, or basic human decency.
The concerns around capital punishment are not limited to lethal injection. The New York Times published a news article  by Rick Rojas and Abbie Van Sickle reporting in June 2026 that the US Supreme Court appears to have decided that capital punishment by Nitrogen gas is inhumane. The article stated:
The Supreme Court’s decision was unsigned and included no reasoning, which is typical in such emergency rulings. Dissent came from three of the court’s conservative justices — Clarence Thomas, Samuel A. Alito Jr. and Neil M. Gorsuch.The Supreme Court decision blocked the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee (49) who will remain on death row in Alabama.
If the use of nitrogen gas, for capital punishment, is inhumane, then botched capital punishment by lethal injection is also inhumane.

The concerns associated with lethal injection executions are the same concerns associated with lethal poison assisted suicide deaths.

In Oregon, where assisted suicide has been legal for more than 25 years, the longest time from ingestion to death in the 2025 assisted suicide report was 123 hours (more than 5 days). 

Deaths that take 123 hours are not peaceful or dignified deaths. 

But 123 hours to die by lethal poison is not an outlier. In 2023 the longest time of death was 137 hours (almost 6 days).

There may be many more assisted suicide deaths that took several days to be completed but the Oregon assisted suicide data only indicates the longest time of death. 

Clearly assisted suicide deaths can be inhumane.

The issues concerning assisted suicide also extend to euthanasia, which involves similar lethal injection drugs.

The story about the euthanasia (MAiD) death of Brigitte Stegemann (83) who lived near Belleville Ontario presented similar concerns. The Daily Mail reported:
Once back inside the home, the nurse started the IV, Kranendonk alleges. ...

The nurse struggled to insert the IV into Stegemann's right arm, and ended up piercing her repeatedly with the needle before attempting her left arm.

Kranendonk remembers in graphic detail the copious amount of blood, which made the whole procedure feel strangely unprofessional.

'She's asking us to hand her things, to flush out the needle. So we're now a part of this. She's asking us to grab things for her, and to hold things for her.

'This nurse is not wearing gloves. There's blood all over her hands, there's blood all over the place,' she says, horrified by the memory.
The problem begins with the concept that it is acceptable to kill people.

If death by capital punishment can be cruel and unusual punishment then killing people by lethal poison for assisted suicide or euthanasia is also cruel, inhumane and dehumanizing.

Life Worth Living. Winner at the Niagara International Film Festival.


Alex Schadenberg
Executive Director, Euthanasia Prevention Coalition


I was talking with Frank Panico, who filmed and edited the Life Worth Living film, about the film festivals that we entered the Life Worth Living film. While going through the list we noticed that Life Worth Living was considered in several film festivals, it was screened in a few festivals and it won at the Niagara International Film Festival in June 2026.

This was a significant achievement and I wish we had known this earlier.

The Life Worth Living film was also a finalist at the Remember the Future World Film Festival in Cannes France.

You should screen the Life Worth Living film in your community. You can help change hearts and minds by screening the award winning Life Worth Living film. 

Purchase or rent the Life Worth Living film from the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition at: https://lifeworthlivingfilm.com

Watch the Life Worth Living film trailer:

Reviews we received of the film:
I just watched Life Worth Living and I have to say I'm so incredibly impressed. I can't contain my enthusiasm for this film. It's one of the best film projects on the subject of medical killing ever. I'd expect awards to be forthcoming for best documentary film. Lester.
Another review:
I have purchased the film "Life Worth Living" a couple of weeks ago and have watched it. I feel that it's a film that everyone should watch because it shows what is happening in the system of "health" care in Canada and it opens our eyes to the reality of how far our government and the medical system has gone in the direction of killing people instead of healing people.

I would like to ask permission to show this film for our parish community
. Eva
The Euthanasia Prevention Coalition granted Eva permission to have the film shown in her community. Please arrange screenings of the film.
 
Life Worth Living features:
  • Alicia Duncan, whose mother died by euthanasia with conditions based on mental health, 
  • Kelsi Sheren, a Canadian military veteran who came back from combat with PTSD and other disabilities. Kelsi is a social media influencer and a life coach.
  • Roger Foley, a Canadian man living with a significant disability who has been pressured by hospital staff to request euthanasia.
  • Dr David D'Souza, an Ontario chronic pain specialist.
  • Dr Catherine Ferrier, a Quebec Gerontologist and a leader of Physicians' Alliance against Euthanasia, 
  • Dr Will Johnston, a Vancouver family physician and leader of Euthanasia Resistance BC
  • Kathy Matusiak Costa, Executive Director of Compassionate Community Care,
  • Alex Schadenberg, (myself), author, keynote speaker, International leader opposing euthanasia and assisted suicide.
The Euthanasia Prevention Coalition needs your help.
  1. Purchase the Life Worth Living Film (Life Worth Living film Link)
  2. Arrange to have Life Worth Living shown in your community. Contact us at: info@epcc.ca
  3. You may want a speaker at the event to lead a discussion. Contact us at: info@epcc.ca

One family's experience with mental health. Support Bill C-218

The point I wish to make is that even patients who have failed to improve with every other treatment must not be written off as being without hope!

We received this letter from Sharon Hunt in Saskatchewan.

Our family hopes that the story of my nephew Sean might help to strengthen the case against expanding MAID eligibility for the mentally ill. 

Sean suffered from obsessive compulsive disorder, anxiety disorder, and depressive disorder, in addition to several physical conditions which were not life threatening. The list of unbelievably terrible encounters with emergency services at the hospital, the psychiatric unit and psychiatrists is long. Years of failed treatment, adverse effects of medicines, episodes of psychosis, days of weeping and dealing with tremors were all made worse by poverty and anxiety over housing. His mom was his main caregiver, and because of inadequacy of our social safety net, she did this at sacrifice to her own well-being and to her financial security in retirement. (Their hope was for the federal plan for Disability without Poverty, which had stalled for years in Ottawa.) 

Eventually his mom was able to raise money (using a go fund me page on social media) for Sean to receive treatment at a special Ketamine clinic. That’s when a miracle began to unfold! Ketamine can be dangerous and has been known to kill persons who were self medicating. But in the controlled environment of the clinic, with anesthesiologist and counsellor present, Sean began to respond at the very first treatment! The problem was that Ketamine is not covered under the provincial drug plan and is prohibitively expensive for most people. The point I wish to make is that even patients who have failed to improve with every other treatment must not be written off as being without hope! Relegating them to death by MAID would be a very serious mistake!

In the end, we were still watching Sean’s progress toward a better life when he died very unexpectedly at age 39 from an undiagnosed heart condition.

Because of his mom’s advocacy, the Saskatchewan Mental Health Association established “Sean’s Fund”, a charity dedicated to improving the lives of persons with intellectual disabilities due to mental illness. It’s a lesson in hopeful action that must not be lost on our parliamentarians as they go to vote on Bill C-218.

Sincerely, Sharon Hunt

Bill C-218 will go to a vote on October 7. Call your Member of Parliament.

Alex Schadenberg
Executive Director, Euthanasia Prevention Coalition

Bill C-218, the bill to prevent euthanasia for mental illness as a sole criteria was debated on December 5, 2025 and September 23, 2026 and
 will go to a vote on October 7.
 
We need at least 30 Liberal MP's to support Bill C-218. 

The easiest way to support Bill C-218 is to call your Member of Parliament before October 7 and tell your MP to support Bill C-218. The phone number is part of the MP contact information. (Member of Parliament List).

In March 2021, the Canada's parliament expanded the euthanasia law by passing Bill C-7. One of the expansions in the law  permitted euthanasia for a mental illness alone. but, at that time, the government declared a two-year moratorium to provide time to prepare for the change.

The government delayed the implementation of euthanasia for mental illness, as a sole criteria, three times with implementation now approved for March 17, 2027.

Tamara Jansen (MP - Cloverdale - Langley City) introduced private members Bill C-218 to prevent euthanasia (MAiD) for mental illness as the sole criteria. 

Bill C-218 excludes mental illness from being defined as a "grievous and irremediable medical condition" for the purposes of MAiD. Bill C-218, if passed will prevent MAID for mental illness as a sole criteria.

The vote on Bill C-218 is scheduled for Wednesday, October 7, 2026.

There are several ways that you can help Bill C-218 be passed:

  1. Sign the petition in support of Bill C-218 (Link).
  2. It is easiest to call your Member of Parliament. The phone number is part of the MP contact information. (Member of Parliament List).
  3. Contact your Member of Parliament (MP) by email and share your support for Bill C-218. Contact your Member of Parliament at: (Member of Parliament List).
  4. Refer to the information in the Bill C-218 handout for Members of Parliament (Link).
  5. Send your personal stories about living with mental illness to info@epcc.ca.
  6. Share your story about living with mental illness, as Andrew Lawton (MP) did: I got better. Support Bill C-218 prevent MAiD for Mental Illness (Link). 
Remember. The majority of Canadians do not support MAiD for mental illness. 

Mario Canseco, the President of Research Co, was published by Business Intelligence for BC with polling indicating that the majority of Canadians do not support (MAiD) euthanasia for mental illness. Conseco reported that:
At this point, only an adult with a grievous and irremediable medical condition can seek medical assistance in dying in Canada. An expansion that would cover mental illness is expected to come into place in March 2027. Just over two in five Canadians (42 per cent, down one point) believe mental illness is a good reason for a person to request medical assistance in dying.
To pass, Bill C-218 needs Member of Parliament from all political parties to support it. Keys to speaking to your Member of Parliament:
  • Only comment on MAiD for mental illness alone. Bill C-218 only deals with that issue. There are many concerns, but mixing issues weakens your position.
  • Contact your Member of Parliament, even if you know his/her position on MAiD.
  • Ask others, including groups that you belong to, to contact the Member of Parliament.
More information on Bill C-218.

Wednesday, September 30, 2026

Kristin Logan left Canada for cancer treatment, after being given a MAiD pamphlet

Alex Schadenberg
Executive Director, Euthanasia Prevention Coalition


Kristin Logan
Denette Wilford reported for the Toronto Sun on September 22 that Kristen Logan, left Canada to obtain cancer treatment in the US after waiting nine months for a diagnosis and then being given a pamphlet for Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) also known as euthanasia.

Wilford's report states:
A woman moved to the United States after doctors in Canada gave her a death sentence — and even advised her on how to carry it out.

Wilford explains what Logan said while being interviewed by Laura Ingraham on Fox news:

Logan revealed that she was waiting for an appointment with a specialist before literature about medical assistance in dying (MAID) was sent her way.

“I hadn’t even seen an oncologist yet before I got that pamphlet,” she told host Laura Ingraham.

“It took nine months to even get to a place where I was diagnosed,” Logan recounted, explaining that she was told in an emergency room that she had Stage 4 metastatic cancer, which spreads from where it first started to distant parts of the body through the blood or lymphatic system.

In Logan’s case, she had first been diagnosed with Stage 4 ovarian cancer.

“As I’m waiting for even the first call from the oncology team, I get this pamphlet in the mail basically telling me that I can go and kill myself,” she recounted to Ingraham.

“It was very disturbing. At that point you realize what a dystopian situation it is because nobody’s going to tell you how long you’re going to be waiting for treatment,” she continued, noting that doctors told her she was actually “fast-tracked,” which Logan found “ridiculous.”
Logan's situation has improved:
Logan, who has American citizenship, left Canada for good last year, but she first tried to return to the U.S. three years ago when, at the time, she was “dying.”

Her prognosis now is “looking pretty decent,” Logan revealed.

“I’m in a much better position for having [left Canada],” she continued, noting the “outstanding” medical care she has received in the U.S. since.

“And I’m still here when they told me three years ago that I wouldn’t make it two years.”
Wilfred continues the report with the story of Brigitte Stegemann (83) who recently died by (MAiD) euthanasia in the Belleville Ontario area even though her ability to consent to be killed was questionable.

Tuesday, September 29, 2026

Letter to Members of Parliament - Support Bill C-218

Bill C-218 will go to a vote on October 7. Instructions to Help prevent euthanasia for mental illness (Link to article).

Dear (Name of Member of Parliament): 

My name is Debbie Fisher and I write this letter to you to ask for your support for Bill C-218. I am confident you are aware of those who suffer with mental illness and I am very concerned that mental illness could lead someone to request medical aid in dying. I do not understand how a mentally ill person could be capable of making that choice. We need to help people with mental illness, not offer assistance to die. Have we as a nation become that tolerant of legalized killing? 

My beautiful mother became depressed in 2019 due the quality of her life as a senior person. She feared she was a burden to her family due to her deteriorating health. 

During a stay in the hospital after she took too much of her medication, I was approached by a doctor who informed me that my mother wished to die. I was very upset because I knew what the implications were to this revelation. Fortunately, my Mom had signed a legal document, when she was of sound mind, to prevent her from being assisted with suicide or euthanasia. I told the doctor that my mother, who was a woman of faith, may have wanted to die but she didn’t want to be killed. By the grace of God she recovered and on her 94th birthday she went bowling with her grandchildren and great grandchildren. She passed 3 months later of natural causes.

My mother was offered help through support and a reason to live – not killing. How many mentally compromised people will die if the law is changed to allow MAID for the mentally ill? How can it even be legal for a mentally ill person to make that kind of request?

I am begging you to vote yes to Bill C-218 on October 7th and put the brakes on this idea that the mentally ill should have access to assistance in dying and euthanasia.

Respectfully, 
Debbie Fisher