By Odile Marcotte
Retired Professor Department of Computer Science, UQAM
![]() |
| Odile Marcotte |
Consider the issue of social class (or socio-economic status), which I will address in this post. Studies have shown repeatedly that among the patients dying through euthanasia or assisted suicide, the proportion of patients with higher education and financial means is greater than in the general population. This is indeed confirmed by Dr. Louis Daigle, who has euthanized more than 650 people over a period of nine years.
Dr. Daigle, who specializes in emergency medicine, seems to have empathy for the people he euthanizes. His fellow doctors at the Collège des médecins du Québec, along with the pro-euthanasia lobby in Québec and Canada, have succeeded in:
- making euthanasia legal,
- making it a procedure paid by medicare and performed in all hospitals,
- redefining palliative medicine as a discipline that includes the possibility of ending the life of a patient,
- extending euthanasia to patients not at the end of their life and not enjoying the same comfort as the rest of the population, and
- denying palliative care homes (at least in British Columbia and Québec) the permission to exclude euthanasia from its services.
In other words, the comfortable class has achieved its goals and persuaded the rest of the population to support euthanasia as a way of avoiding "suffering" at the end of life, even though this profound change has huge and unforeseen consequences for every individual.
Euthanasia has become a social class issue.




