Wednesday, March 12, 2014

Connecticut Governor Malloy is unlikely to support assisted suicide bill HB 5326,

By Alex Schadenberg
International Chair: Euthanasia Prevention Coalition

Gov. Daniel Malloy
The New Haven Register reported today that Connecticut Gov. Daniel Malloy opposes assisted suicide. The Connecticut House is debating assisted suicide bill HB 5326, a bill that will have public hearings in the Public Health Committee on Monday March 17.

On March 6 the New Hampshire House defeated the assisted suicide bill HB 1325 by a vote of 219 to 66.

The New Haven Register reported that:

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy leaned Wednesday away from legislation allowing a doctor to prescribe lethal medication to a dying patient in favor of a policy giving patients broader rights to refuse treatment.  
“It’s a very tricky issue,” the governor said at an unrelated press conference when he was asked about a policy, which has been labeled “aid-in-dying” by supporters and “assisted suicide” by critics.
Malloy then explained that he supports a bill that provides clarity on advanced directives. The article stated:
The governor endorsed another piece of legislation which would create a pilot program on “medical orders for life sustaining treatment.” The idea is similar to “do not resuscitate” orders, which are already in use in Connecticut. It would give seriously ill patients the option of creating directives indicating they want to refuse life-sustaining treatments. 
“I support that legislation and I think people in Connecticut overwhelmingly support that legislation,” Malloy said.
When asked if he would support the assisted suicide bill he said:
“If it’s more like the directive bill as opposed to an assisted suicide bill, then I think it will pass. If it’s an assisted suicide bill, I think it’s going to get some opposition,” he said. “I’ll work with folks to craft the best bill possible that will yield the citizens of our state the most say over their treatment, and what treatment would be undertaken to prolong life and what treatments under what conditions would not take place.”
The Connecticut Mirror reported Gov Malloy stating on Friday March 14 that:
“I don’t think in society we should be viewed as encouraging suicide. I would have to understand what the safeguards are with respect to that. A lot of what I’ll say and do in the future about that issue is dependent on the language I’ve been presented.” 
"I then become a little uneasy when it comes to saying that as a matter of state policy, that we're going to take proactive actions to end life."
Cathy Ludlum
An article in the New Haven Register from February 25 interviewed Cathy Ludlum, who represents the disability rights group, Second Thoughts Connecticut. Ludlum stated:
Ludlum herself has a disability requiring a feeding tube and breathing assistance at night and said she would be terminal if not for the help she gets from aides. She is serving on a committee drafting an alternative to aid in dying, called medical orders for life-sustaining treatment, which would give patients choices about the end of their lives but not assisted suicide. 
“Why don’t we let these processes work themselves out instead of rushing to a solution like assisted suicide,” Ludlum said. 
To Ludlum, “One of the really glaring missing things is no … independent witness at the death. We need to honor the complexity, and we need to honor the fallibility of humans … fallibility in this case is death.”

No comments: