Executive Director, Euthanasia Prevention Coalition
![]() |
| St Paul's hospital Vancouver |
(Article for Trail Day 1) (Article for Trial Day 2)
Samantha O'Neill (34) died on April 4, 2023 by euthanasia (MAiD) after being transferred from St Paul's hospital in Vancouver to a Hospice that does euthanasia.
Suzanne Lazaruk reporting for the Vancouver Sun on January 14 explains:
The O’Neills, the pro-assisted death group Dying with Dignity, and a former St. Paul’s doctor filed the lawsuit to ask the B.C. Supreme Court to remove the exemption granted to religious groups such as the hospital’s operator, Providence Health Care, to allow them to opt out of assisted dying procedures.Lazaruk reported on the testimony of Meagan Mackay, a friend of Sam O'Neill:
The exemption is based on the section of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which guarantees the fundamental freedom of Canadians to follow their conscience and religion and not to act against their beliefs.
Sam’s friend, Meaghan MacKay, on Wednesday testified that the transfer was upsetting to watch even though Sam was sedated through transport.
She said she had heard how the assisted dying procedure was peaceful and beautiful, but she said the reality of Sam’s was that her final goodbyes were rushed because the transfer team was waiting. And she said the hospice didn’t appear set up to accommodate her arrival and Sam’s mother and a friend had to clear a room of medical aids before the gurney could be rolled in.
A witness for the plaintiffs Robert Chevarie, explained that his grandmother, who had also been transferred from a religiously affiliated hospital for euthanasia, suffered from being transferrered because of her obesity.
Chevarie is arguing that his grandmother should had euthanasia at the religiously affiliated hospital. Chevarie's testimony misses the fact that people are transferred everyday from one hospital to another for procedures. His grandmothers obesity would have been a problem whether the transfer was for euthanasia or for anything else. In today's healthcare system, hospitals cannot provide all procedures, whether it is a faith based institution or not.
Also on Wednesday, Skolrood delivered his judgment on an application by Vancouver Coastal Health Authority, one of the defendants, ruling the evidence of the three plaintiff doctors should be limited to their observations and experience and not include opinions.
Their evidence will be used to establish that the assisted dying ban at the hospital caused the doctors moral distress, violating their Charter rights — the guarantee of their life, liberty and security of person, and their rights to freedom of conscience and religion.
This means that Justice Skolrood will only consider the observations and experience of the doctors involved and not their opinions.
On June 17, 2024; Dying with Dignity and the family of Sam O'Neill, who requested euthanasia at St Paul's Hospital in Vancouver but transferred to another facility to die by euthanasia, launched a Charter Challenge claiming that O'Neill's rights were infringed when she was transferred from St. Paul's Hospital to another facility for euthanasia.
One of the goals of the euthanasia lobby is to force all Canadian medical institutions to provide (MAiD) euthanasia.
One of the goals of the euthanasia lobby is to force all Canadian medical institutions to provide (MAiD) euthanasia.

1 comment:
THAT IS AGAINST HUMAN RIGHTS AND ETHICS TO FORCE DEATH ANYWHERE BECAUSE IT IS NATURALLY WRONG AND EVIL AND AGAINST THE CONSCIENCE AND AGAINST THE Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms BECAUSE KILLING IS NOT A RIGHT AND NOT A FREEDOM!!! NO HEALTHCARE OR INSTITUTION SHOULD BE FORCED REGARDLESS IF IT IS RELIGIOUS OR NOT TO KILL; KILLING IS NOT A SOLUTION SO IT SHOULD NOT EVEN BE AN OPTION OR IN ANY LAW FOR ANY CIRCUMSTANCES AND EUTHANASIA AND ASSISTED SUICIDE IS ALL ABOUT THAT AND ONLY THAT; THE Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms NEEDS TO BE UPDATE TO STATE THAT IT GUARANTEES CANADIANS THE RIGHT TO FEEL SAFE AND TO NOT HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT BEING FORCED TO CHOSE DEATH AND BE KILLED AS KILLING IS ILLEGAL FOR ALL CIRCUMSTANCES AND FOR ALL AS OPPOSED TO FOCUSING ON RELIGION AND RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS AND EXEMPTIONS; I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY A FORMER DOCTOR OF St. Paul's WOULD JOIN IN ON THIS INSANITY AND SUPPORT THE CRAZINESS OF THE Dying with Dignity Death Cults And The O'Neills In This NONSENSE Because That Is Not A Doctor To Begin With And Also They "Have The Option To Find Another Workplace" If THEY DO NOT AGREE WHERE THEY ARE WORKING; THESE PEOPLE INCLUDING THE FRIENDS AND WITNESSES OF SAM O'NEILL HAVE NOTHING BETTER TO DO THEN COMPLAIN ABOUT INSIGNIFICANT THINGS WHEN THE REAL SIGNIFICANT THING IS THE LOSS OF LIFE OF THE INDIVIDUAL AND THAT IT SHOULD NOT HAVE OCCURRED TO BEGIN WITH, THE INDIVIDUAL SHOULD REALLY STILL BE ALIVE NOT DEAD; I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT KIND OF SICK PEOPLE THERE ARE AND TO THE EXTENT OF THEIR ACTIONS; WHY WOULD; IF PEOPLE ARE ARGUING THAT THEY WANTED THEIR FRIEND OR FAMILY TO BE KILLED AT A RELIGIOUSLY AFFILIATED HOSPITAL WHY GO TO COURT ABOUT THIS, WHY WOULD THE COURT AND JUDGE ALLOW THIS BEGIN WITH??? THE PERSON WHO WAS KILLED IS THE VICTIM AND THEY COULD HAVE CHOSEN THE LOCATION AND SPECIFIC HOSPITAL THEY WANTED TO BE KILLED AT WHICH AGAIN IS EVIL AND WRONG; If Justice Skolrood States That A Patient's Transportation For Death Caused A Doctor Moral Distress Instead of The Killing Of The Patient Causing The Moral Distress WE NOW HAVE MORE BIG PROBLEMS COMING!!! If Just Skolrood States These "Witnesses" Had Their Charter Rights Violated Because They Did Not Like A "Transportation" That Their Friend And Loved One Took As Opposed To BEING AGAINST THEIR FRIEND AND LOVED ONE BEING KILLED WE HAVE MORE BIG PROBLEMS COMING Because Charter Rights Are Based On The Guarantees Of Life, NOT THE GUARANTEE OF DEATH AND BEING KILLED AND THERE IS NO SECURITY, LIBERTY, OR LIFE IN DEATH CAUSED BY KILLING AS THAT IS DISTRESSING TO THE HUMAN CONSCIENCE IN ALL NATURAL LAWS AND EXPERIENCES;
Post a Comment