Wednesday, May 27, 2026

Euthanasia and social class

By Odile Marcotte
Retired Professor Department of Computer Science, UQAM

Odile Marcotte
The June 2026 issue of the L'actualité magazine includes an article on euthanasia entitled "Le dernier choix," i.e., The last choice. This article is a reasonably good one and does not exhibit a bias towards euthanasia, except in the beginning and end of the article, which feature (as usual) a patient suffering from a grievous illness asking for and receiving the "treatment" called euthanasia. The article, however, raises several questions that need to be addressed.

Consider the issue of social class (or socio-economic status), which I will address in this post. Studies have shown repeatedly that among the patients dying through euthanasia or assisted suicide, the proportion of patients with higher education and financial means is greater than in the general population. This is indeed confirmed by Dr. Louis Daigle, who has euthanized more than 650 people over a period of nine years. 

Daigle states that the suffering of seeing oneself waste away is what MAiD allows his patients to avoid. Indeed, after a good life, after earning good money and enjoying many travels, they will not accept what they call "an undignified death." Dr. Daigle goes on to say that those patients request euthanasia because they wish to "hold the reins" until the very end of their life.

Dr. Daigle, who specializes in emergency medicine, seems to have empathy for the people he euthanizes. His fellow doctors at the Collège des médecins du Québec, along with the pro-euthanasia lobby in Québec and Canada, have succeeded in:
  • making euthanasia legal,
  • making it a procedure paid by medicare and performed in all hospitals,
  • redefining palliative medicine as a discipline that includes the possibility of ending the life of a patient, 
  • extending euthanasia to patients not at the end of their life and not enjoying the same comfort as the rest of the population, and 
  • denying palliative care homes (at least in British Columbia and Québec) the permission to exclude euthanasia from its services.

In other words, the comfortable class has achieved its goals and persuaded the rest of the population to support euthanasia as a way of avoiding "suffering" at the end of life, even though this profound change has huge and unforeseen consequences for every individual.

Euthanasia has become a social class issue.

No comments: