Alex Schadenberg
Executive Director, Euthanasia Prevention Coalition
An article by Molly Quell published by the Courthouse News Service on April 12, 2022 stated that the European Court of Human Rights found that Svend Lings’ 2018 conviction for medically assisted suicide didn’t violate the European Convention on Human Rights. Quell reported:
Lings, the former chief physician at Odense University Hospital in southern Denmark, was given a 40-day prison sentence in 2018, later increased to 60 days, for helping two people die and a third person attempt suicide. The 81-year-old, now-retired physician founded Læger for Aktiv Dødshjælp, or Physicians in Favour of Euthanasia, in 2015, which advocates for legalizing assisted suicide in Denmark.Quell explains that Lings appealed to the European Convention on Human Rights after losing at the Denmark Supreme Court.
Following a 2017 radio interview, in which he described how his organization had helped at least 10 people take their own lives, his medical license was revoked and, after further investigation, he was ultimately charged for his involvement in three suicides or attempted suicides.
Lings argued before the court in Denmark, as well as before the ECHR, that he had merely been disseminating information about suicide. After his final appeal failed before the Danish Supreme Court, he complained to the ECHR, arguing that under the right to expression, guaranteed by the convention which created the court in 1959, what he did should not be considered illegal.
The seven-judge panel disagreed, writing that Lings “had not only provided guidance, but had also, by specific acts, procured medications for the persons concerned, in the knowledge that it was intended for their suicide.” It was clear, the court wrote, that he had gone beyond simply providing general information about suicide.
Similar to other euthanasia activists, Ling openly challenged the law. He likely hoped that his actions would result in an acquittal, thus striking down the law, instead the Denmark and European courts have upheld his conviction.
1 comment:
I don't remember reading this one when it was posted, but I just clicked on 'Denmark' in the Labels section of the Blog Archive and was glad to read that my country of birth still has morals.
But it's clear that there still is a death culture there. When I read the name of Lings' group, "Læger for Aktiv Dødshjælp" and then the translation, I must say that there's something lost in it. If I were to do a translation using each word separately, it would be "Doctors for Active Death Help." That shows the true dangers of it without making up some formal words to hide what it actually is. "Activ" isn't just being in favour of something, it's "Active" or "to take action regarding something" (& the easiest to see that the translation is made to sound less controversial).
"Død(s)" is "dead (or death)" & "hjælp" is literally, "help." So what image does that bring to mind as compared to euthanasia? Well, to me it's a Grim Reaper. Danes have a way of calling things as they are. It shows the brutality of what euthanasia actually is.
As a note, I did not go to school in Denmark before we moved to Canada, but I'm still fluid in Danish (& my parents taught me to read & write when I was young), so perhaps my translations are a truer sense of what is thought when words are read or stated from a basic standpoint.
Post a Comment