Alex Schadenberg
Executive Director, Euthanasia Prevention Coalition
The Nevada State Legislature is debating assisted suicide Bill AB 351. AB 351 is similar to the Oregon and Washington State assisted suicide laws.
There are several hidden factors within this and other assisted suicide bills that lead me to wonder what the assisted suicide lobby is trying to cover-up. For instance, AB 351 forbids a coroner from investigating an assisted suicide death. AB 351 states:
Section 1: Chapter 440 of NRS is hereby amended by adding thereto a new section to read as follows:This bill provision denies equal protection under the law for people who are prescribed lethal assisted suicide drugs.
1. A coroner, coroner’s deputy or local health officer:
(a) Is not required to certify the cause of death of a patient who dies after self-administering a medication that is designed to end the life of the patient in accordance with the provisions of sections 5 to 30, inclusive, of this act; and
(b) Must not investigate the death of a patient who dies after self-administering a medication that is designed to end the life of the patient in accordance with the provisions of sections 5 to 30, inclusive, of this act if the coroner or coroner’s deputy confirms the circumstances of the death with a physician responsible for overseeing the care of the patient or the physician who prescribed the medication.
AB 351 requires doctors to lie on the death certificate. AB 351 states:
3.The medical certificate of death of a patient who dies after self-administering a medication that is designed to end the life of the patient in accordance with sections 5 to 30, inclusive, of this act:
(a) May be signed by the physician who prescribed the medication or the operator of a facility for hospice care, as defined in NRS 449.0033, at which the patient dies;
(b) Must specify the terminal condition with which the patient was diagnosed as the cause of death; and
(c) Must not mention that the patient self-administered a medication that is designed to end the life of the patient.
Changing death certificates, for political purposes, has long-term consequences on future research concerning life-expectancy for certain medical conditions but it also affects the ability of law enforcement from investigating potential murder.
Similar to other bills, the proposed assisted suicide request letter uses the term may self-administer. I am fully aware that the assisted suicide lobby says that may self-administer means that a person may decide not to take the lethal drugs, but it also means that someone else may administer the lethal drugs (homicide). The term may self-administer protects physicians or others from being charged with homicide, if they administer the lethal drugs.
Assisted suicide laws are designed to protect medical professionals who are willing to be involved with killing their patients by prescribing lethal drugs. Assisted suicide bills are not designed to protect the person who has asked for death, even though the person asking for death may be experiencing depression, feelings of hopelessness, social isolation and fear, all conditions that are properly dealt with by caring interventions and not killing.
- Article: Oregon 2020 assisted suicide report - 28% increase in asisted suicide deaths (Link).
3 comments:
Does Canada's assisted suicide laws contain similar provisions?
Canada's euthanasia law forbids doctors from stating that the death was from MAiD, but it does not forbid Coroners from investigating a death, even though the euthanasia regulations make it nearly impossible to uncover abuse.
My brother-in-law, a minister, told me one day "God soundly rebuked me and said I was never to pray for death - only for life." Those behind euthanasia will have to account to God, the Author of Life, someday on the other side and it won't be pleasant.
Post a Comment