Showing posts with label Nic Steenhout. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nic Steenhout. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 3, 2022

Euthanasia, where and when does it stop?

By Nic Steenhout, Disability rights advocate and the former Director of Vivre dans la Dignité

Nic Steenhout
It is with great sadness and a fair bit of distress that I learned about two recent cases of so-called "Medical Aid In Dying" (euthanasia by any other name). The stories of two disabled women who were pushed to apply for MAID because their circumstances didn't allow them the choice of living would be distressing for most of us.

It is hitting me particularly hard because less than 10 years ago, I was saying that if Québec, and then Canada, legalized euthanasia, it wouldn't take long before people with disabilities no worse than my own, that were not at end of life, would be able to apply for and be granted euthanasia.

I really hate to say "I told you so". I hate even more that I was right.

The government said at the time: "there's not going to be a slippery slope". They lied. They called me alarmist. As it turns out, I was not exaggerating the dangers.

On April 13, 2022, CTV was reporting the story of a 51 year old woman which multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) who could not find housing. She applied for and was given medical aid in dying.

On April 30, 2022, CTV again reports the story of a disabled woman who could not find housing and applied for euthanasia. This time, the woman is 31, also with MCS, and a wheelchair user. She hasn't yet been killed.

These two women were not given the options to live. Finding wheelchair accessible housing is next to impossible to start with. Finding affordable wheelchair accessible housing is even more difficult. Throw in the need to be protected from chemical exposures, and it becomes really thorny. So thorny that people search for years before being able to find, and opt for death instead.

What are we doing to disabled people? The governmental disability benefits are laughable. Who can find housing, let alone paying all other life necessities, including food, on $1,000 or so a month? The amounts of disability benefits haven't increased in a very long time in Canada. It's almost as if disabled people don't count. It's cheaper to provide euthanasia than support disabled citizens appropriately.

It gets even more interesting when we see that the government was able to unlock funds to help workers through being out of work during the pandemic's early days. The message from our government is very clear. Disabled people don't count.

I haven't been active in the fight against euthanasia (regardless of the name we give it) for the last several years because these public stories, and some very personal ones, just ate at me. It is ironic that as an opponent to euthanasia, I had two family members and a close friend apply for it, and die from it.

My grand mother, in Belgium, died from euthanasia. She was 98 years old. She had some vision issues, and needed a walker to move around. She was most certainly not at imminent risk of dying. But she was incredibly lonely with her family across an ocean.

My aunt, in Québec, was 77 years old. She had Multiple Sclerosis. She'd had a lung removed because of lung cancer, but she'd been in remission for years.

My friend John was in his early 60's. He had cancer. But he was well away from imminent death. He was grocery shopping and preparing meals for the freezer for his spouse the day before his euthanasia.

These three people did not meet the so-called safeguards that the pro-euthanasia crowd said would protect vulnerable people. So even with safeguards in place, there are people dying from euthanasia that shouldn't be. And now... Now we just keep expanding the eligibility criteria.

Where does it stop? When do we decide that supporting disabled people is the right investment in our society, rather than allowing them to die? When do we stop funding suicide prevention programs? Because it's not that far of a stretch to see this happen.

10 years ago I was saying that people with disabilities no worse than my own would soon have access to medical aid in dying. I was right. Please don't let me be right about the elimination of funding for suicide prevention programs. Please.

If you're reading this, it's likely that you already have strong feelings about euthanasia. You're probably outraged by these recent news stories. It's been said before, but we all need to talk to our elected representatives. Personal notes, phone calls, even emails. Let's let them know this is not ok. Let them know that enough is enough. The horse has bolted, we can't close the barn doors. But we can try and fence it in. We can try and limit further erosion.

Tuesday, March 31, 2015

The 2015 HOPE International Symposium on Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide.


The Fourth International Symposium on Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide is hosted by HOPE Australia on May 22 - 23, 2015 at the Rydges Hotel South Park in Adelaide South Australia.



Register for the 2015 HOPE International Symposium.

The 2015 HOPE International Symposium is hosted by HOPE Australia, and co-sponsored by the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition - International, Euthanasia-Free New Zealand, the disability rights group - Lives Worth Living, and Doctors Opposed to Euthanasia.

Renee Joubert
The speakers include:

  • Alex Schadenberg, Executive Director, Euthanasia Prevention Coalition (EPC) and Chair, EPC - International,
  • Paul Russell, Director, HOPE Australia and Vice Chair, EPC - International,
  • Renee Joubert, Director, Euthanasia-Free New Zealand,
  • Craig Wallace, Convenor, Lives Worth Living, a network of people with disabilities,
  • Nic Steenhout, Director, Vivre dans la dignité Quebec.
  • Nic Steenhout
    Henk Reitsma, Board member, EPC - International and an expert on the Netherlands Euthanasia statistics.
  • Tom Mortier, Chemistry professor in Belgium. His depresed mother died by euthanasia in 2012. 
  • Professor Theo Boer, former member of a Dutch Euthanasia Regional Review Committee.
  • Nancy Elliott, Board member, EPC - International and a past three term New Hampshire state representative.
  • Sue Hanson, co-chair NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation - Palliative Care Network
  • Dr Paul Dunne, a leading Palliative Care Medical Specialist in Australia.
  • Brendan Malone, from New Zealand, is a dynamic speaker on youth, culture and media.
This is the first International Symposium hosted in the southern hemisphere by EPC - International. Previous symposia were held in Toronto, Washington, Vancouver, Edinburgh.

Friday, February 6, 2015

Decision of the Supreme Court in the Carter Case: Vulnerable people are most at risk

Media Release
Montreal, February 6, 2015 

The citizen network Living with Dignity and the Physicians' Alliance against Euthanasia acknowledge today's ruling by the Supreme Court of Canada in Carter v. Canada (Attorney General). By stipulating that Kay Carter was within her rights to demand assisted suicide, and asking the Parliament of Canada to amend the Criminal Code to state that "medical aid in dying" is not a homicide, and therefore should not be penalized, the highest court in the land deeply upsets Canadian society.

"This decision of the Supreme Court contradicts the view of the European Court of Human Rights (Pretty v. United Kingdom) said Dr. Marc Beauchamp, president of Living with Dignity. Considering that the Court reaffirms the federal-provincial shared competence on these issues, we encourage parliamentarians to eventually frame in the strictest possible way any exceptions to prevent anyone from being unjustly euthanized without their consent and that such policies never come against access to proper medical care. To avoid abuse and extensions found in Belgium and the Netherlands, Canada must impose much stronger safeguards than those established in the laws and regulations of those countries."

Living with Dignity and the Physicians' Alliance against Euthanasia will continue to advocate for the protection of life and the inherent and inalienable dignity of people made vulnerable by illness, old age or disability. In solidarity, we will make sure to accompany them compassionately.

The Supreme Court of Canada has decided not to protect people from assisted suicide.



The Supreme Court of Canada has made an activist decision by giving physicians the right in law to cause the death of people by assisted suicide.

The Supreme Court is naïve to think that assisted suicide will not be abused, when abuse already occurs.

Dr. Leo Alexander, an American psychiatrist, who was a medical advisor at the Nuremburg trials and who was part of the Nuremburg code: stated in an article in the NEJM (July 1949)

"Whatever proportions these crimes finally assumed, it became evident to all who investigated them that they had started from small beginnings. The beginnings at first were merely a subtle shift in emphasis in basic attitude, basic in the euthanasia movement, that there is such a thing as a life not worthy to be lived."
This is the experience that the Netherlands, Belgium and Switzerland have had with assisted death, and unless Canada’s Parliament resists this same direction, this will be the same experience in Canada.

Recently, a depressed healthy man who was recently retired, but alone and lonely, died by euthanasia in the Netherlands. In Belgium, a healthy depressed woman died from euthanasia after experiencing the break-up of a long-term relationship. In Switzerland, a man died by assisted suicide after receiving a wrong diagnosis.

Giving doctors the right to cause the death of their patients will never be safe and no amount of “so-called safeguards” will protect those who live with depression or abuse. There will always be people who will abuse the power to cause death and there will always be more reasons to cause death.

Assisted suicide creates new paths of abuse for elders, people with disabilities and other socially devalued people. The scourge of elder abuse in our culture continues to grow.

Depression is common for people with significant health conditions. Assisted suicide is an abandonment of people who live with depression who require support and proper care.

Assisted suicide undermines important mental health and suicide prevention programs. Assisted suicide has had a suicide contagion effect in the State of Oregon.

The Supreme Court gave Parliament one year to provide a legislative framework.

Parliament must first use the notwithstanding clause to continue to equally protect every Canadian. Then Parliament and Provincial governments must commit to: improving access to end-of-life care, create awareness to change social attitudes towards the lives of people with disabilities and the reality of elder abuse, and to focus on effective suicide prevention strategies to provide the care that Canadians require and deserve.

The Euthanasia Prevention Coalition will work to protect people from euthanasia and assisted suicide. We will not abandon Canadians to the false lure of assisted suicide and someday the Supreme Court will overturn this activist decision.

EPC is available for media inquiries. 

  • Amy Hasbrouck (Ottawa) from Not Dead Yet Canada is at the Supreme Court Grand Entrance Hall. Contact Amy: (450) 921-3057 or info@tv-ndy.ca
  • Dr Margaret Cottle (Vancouver) EPC Vice President: (604) 222-0288 or mmcottle@mac.com
  • Hugh Scher (Toronto) EPC Legal Counsel: (416) 816-6115 or hugh@sdlaw.ca
  • Nicolas Steenhout (Montreal) Director – Vivre dans la Dignité: (438) 931-1233 or info@vivredignite.org
  • Alex Schadenberg (London) EPC Executive Director: 1-877-439-3348 / (519) 851-1434 or info@epcc.ca 
Euthanasia Prevention Coalition – 1-877-439-3348 – www.epcc.cainfo@epcc.ca

Thursday, February 5, 2015

The Supreme Court of Canada to Release Assisted Suicide Decision Tomorrow.




Euthanasia Prevention Coalition (EPC) Media Release.

EPC is a national non-profit corporation since that supports positive measures while opposing euthanasia and assisted suicide.

The safety and security of every Canadian needs to be the primary concern of the Supreme Court of Canada and Parliament.

Whatever the Supreme Court decides, it will not change the reality that legalizing euthanasia or assisted suicide gives doctors the right, in law, to intentionally cause the death of their patients. Abuse of our current law already occurs. If assisted dying is legalized, abuse will continue.

If legalized, assisted suicide will create new paths to abuse of elders, people with disabilities and other socially devalued people. The scourge of elder abuse in our culture continues to grow.

Depression is common for people with significant health conditions. A study in the Netherlands found that depression was a primary factor for requests for euthanasia.

Recent cases in the Netherlands include: a woman with Tinnitus, a woman who didn’t want to live in a nursing home, and a depressed recently retired man. The reported cases of euthanasia for psychiatric conditions tripled in the Netherlands in 2013.

A significant study from the Netherlands found that at least 300 assisted deaths are done each year without request and 23% of all of the assisted deaths were not reported.

EPC is committed to protecting Canadians from euthanasia and assisted suicide. We believe in caring for people, not killing people.

EPC is available for media inquiries.

  • Amy Hasbrouck (Ottawa) from Not Dead Yet Canada, will be with Taylor Hyatt at the Supreme Court Grand Entrance Hall. Contact Amy: (450) 921-3057 or info@tv-ndy.ca
  • Dr Margaret Cottle (Vancouver) EPC Vice President: (604) 222-0288 or mmcottle@mac.com
  • Hugh Scher (Toronto) EPC Legal Counsel: (416) 816-6115 or hugh@sdlaw.ca
  • Nicolas Steenhout (Montreal) Director – Vivre dans la Dignité: (438) 931-1233 or info@vivredignite.org
  • Alex Schadenberg (London) EPC Executive Director: 1-877-439-3348 / (519) 851-1434 or info@epcc.ca
Euthanasia Prevention Coalition – 1-877-439-3348 – www.epcc.cainfo@epcc.ca

Monday, February 2, 2015

Supreme Court to release assisted suicide decision on Friday.

The Supreme Court of Canada is releasing its decision in the Carter case concerning Canada’s laws that protect people from euthanasia and assisted suicide.

The Euthanasia Prevention Coalition has intervened in this case at every level.

EPC legal counsel Hugh Scher states:
"EPC is concerned about the safety, security and equality of people with disabilities and seniors, which is central to the protections set out under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and our Criminal Code."
EPC - British Columbia chair Dr Will Johnston states:
"This is an important public safety issue. The Court rejected assisted suicide in 1993 and prevented Canada from taking a wrong turn. In the 20 years since, human nature has not changed and people with disabilities and other vulnerable people are still at risk in our health care system. We are better at controlling symptoms, and we also see the abuses of euthanasia in those few jurisdictions where this practice has become entrenched. 
Let us hope that the Supreme Court once again confirms the protections in law from assisted suicide and direct killing of the sick, and that we stay the course by improving symptom control to all who need it."
Disability rights advocate Amy Hasbrouck of Toujours Vivant - Not Dead Yet states:
"People with disabilities, chronic illness and seniors are negatively affected by assisted suicide and euthanasia because it leads to the impression that our lives are lacking in meaning and value as compared to other Canadians."
EPC Executive Director, Alex Schadenberg stated:
"In other jurisdictions, euthanasia has expanded to include people with depression, people with psychiatric problems, people with dementia, teenagers and incompetent people. The laws in other jurisdictions have been abused. 
Canada needs to focus on how it cares for people in difficult circumstances, not how to kill its people."
More information:
For further information contact:

• Dr Margaret Cottle (Vancouver) EPC VP: (604) 222-0288, mmcottle@mac.com
• Alex Schadenberg, (London) EPC Executive Director: (519) 851-1434, info@epcc.ca
• Nicolas Steenhout, (Montreal) Director - Vivre dans la Dignité: (438) 931-1233, info@vivredignite.org
• Hugh Scher (Toronto) EPC legal counsel: (416) 816-6115, hugh@sdlaw.ca
• Amy Hasbrouck, (Montreal) Toujours Vivant-Not Dead Yet: (450) 921-3057, info@tv-ndy.ca

The Euthanasia Prevention Coalition (EPC) is a national coalition of groups and individuals that support positive measures and opposes euthanasia and assisted suicide.

Contact EPC at: 1-877-439-3348 or info@epcc.ca or www.epcc.ca

Wednesday, September 24, 2014

The useless death of Yvan Tremblay

This article was published on the Living with Dignity blog on September 24, 2014.

By Nic Steenhout - The Director of Vivre Dans la Dignité (Living with Dignity) in Quebec

W
Nic Steenhout
e mourn the death of Yvan Tremblay, a man with disabilities who committed suicide rather than be forced out of his apartment on September 14. Isabelle Maréchal describes the situation well
"He decided to end his life because he could no longer deal with an inhuman system."
For 10 years, he lived in adapted housing. The managers of the building where he was staying expelled him because of new safety regulations imposed by the government. Apparently, he could not stay there because it would be impossible to evacuate him in case of fire. If he did not leave by himself, Mr. Tremblay would have been placed in a much smaller home, without even a kitchen. No space for his things. His options were drastically reduced.

A neighbor said
"Yvan didn't have an extraordinary quality of life, but here he found a semblance of life. And they blew out the small flame that was left."
We already wrote that legalizing euthanasia creates a risk for people with disabilities because they do not have choices or alternatives. This is the situation Mr. Tremblay found himself in. He saw no other option than death.

Wednesday, July 23, 2014

Dutch pediatricians want to legalise euthanasia for children under 12 years old.

This article was originally posted on the Living with Dignity blog on July 14, 2014.

Belgium adopted euthanasia for children a few months ago. Anneke Stoffelen tells us in Volksrant that pediatricians in the Netherlands now suggest legalizing euthanasia for children under the age of 12. This suggestion is particularly worrying because the decision for euthanasia would be made by doctors and parents, without needing the consent of the child. We are talking about legalizing involuntary euthanasia.

The Netherlands currently allows euthanasia of newborns (up to the age of one year old). And children over 12 years old are considered competent to make that decision. If they are between the ages of 12 and 16, they must have the permission of a parent to agree to euthanasia.

Of course, they always talk about euthanasia being only for people who are seriously ill, or who have serious birth defects. But there are many abuses of the rules of legal euthanasia in the Netherlands, such as the case of the 45 psychiatric patients euthanized last year. No safeguard can truly ensure that there will be no abuse.

Dutch Professor of Pediatrics Eduard Verhagen said: 
"We all do it, so why draw the line for children up to 12 years old?"
One can find some logic to his argument. In fact, those who support euthanasia in Quebec have already used a similar argument and asked to include minors and incompetent people in Act 52. They used the argument that to exclude these groups would be discriminatory, and would constitute an incomplete answer to the original question.

This indicates that the expansion of laws permitting euthanasia is inevitable. We must stop it before it starts.

Links to similar articles:

Tuesday, July 22, 2014

National Euthanasia Symposium 2014


October 4, 2014 (9:00 am - 5:00 pm)
Registration Fee: $99 regular, $79 for Students/Persons with disabilities.
Registration includes lunch and refreshment breaks.
Register for the Euthanasia Symposium.

Speakers include: 
  • Gerbert van Loenen - author of the book: What happens once euthanasia has become legal, an experience from the Netherlands.
  • Dr Kevin Fitzpatrick - Not Dead Yet UK.
  • Amy Hasbrouck - Toujours Vivant / Not Dead Yet Québec.
  • Nic Steenhout - Vivre dans la Dignité (Living with Dignity) Québec.
  • Michel Racicot - Lawyer, Physicians Alliance Québec.
  • Hugh Scher - Legal Counsel, Euthanasia Prevention Coalition.
  • Alex Schadenberg - Executive Director, Euthanasia Prevention Coalition.
  • Diana Ford - A personal story about the death of her father.
At the Best Western Plus Gatineau - Ottawa Hotel 
131 Rue Laurier, Gatineau QC.
(less than 1 km from downtown Ottawa)
Book your room for $120 per night at: 1-800-265-8550. Password: Euthanasia Symposium.

Register for the Euthanasia Symposium by contacting EPC at: 1-877-439-3348 or by emailing EPC at: info@epcc.ca.

A donation of $79 will enable a student / person with disabilities to attend the Symposium.

Thursday, June 5, 2014

Quebec’s elected officials have lifted a vitally important ban.

Living with Dignity denounces the adoption of Bill 52 on end of life care.

Montreal, June 5, 2014 - Dramatic day for Quebec today: by a vote of 94 to 22, the Members of the National Assembly have adopted Bill 52, "An Act respecting end-of-life care". The citizen network Living with Dignity (LWD) denounces the new law, which allows anyone who meets the criteria to request and obtain death on demand by a doctor. Our elected representatives from all parties have failed in their duty to protect the most vulnerable and lifted a ban that has existed since the time of Hippocrates - more than 24 centuries ago– and which is the foundation of medicine and of life in society that is respectful of others.

Now, in Quebec, the act of a doctor who kills a person at his request to end his suffering, instead of relieving the suffering, will be considered health care. Moreover, "medical aid in dying ", as the law calls it, must be offered without exception by all public institutions in Quebec - hospitals, long-term care centres, CLSCs - regardless of the convictions of the management or staff of the institution.

With some exceptions, our elected officials have also chosen to ignore that Quebec does not have jurisdiction to decriminalize euthanasia. Killing a patient, even at his or her request, is not a medical treatment; it is a homicide and, as such, prohibited by the Criminal Code.

The Québec National Assembly votes on euthanasia Bill 52.

The Euthanasia Prevention Coalition (EPC) opposes Québec euthanasia Bill 52.

Sign the petition: Stop Euthanasia Bill 52 in Quebec.

Bill 52 legalizes euthanasia by re-defining it as a form of healthcare under the term "end-of-life care."


Alex Schadenberg, executive director of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition stated:

"Let's be clear, Bill 52 gives Québec physicians the right to intentionally and directly cause the death of persons by lethal injection. This represents an act of homicide and not an act of "end of life care."
Bill 52 claims to limit euthanasia to voluntary requests from people who are at the end of life but Bill 52 does not define end of life.

Québekers should not trust their life to the provisions in Bill 52, which are imprecise, open to abuse and based on the Belgian euthanasia law.



In Belgium, euthanasia is being done to people who are not terminally ill but living with depression, euthanasia has been extended to children and studies have proven that euthanasia is often done to people without request.

The Québec government re-introduced Bill 52 even after people with disabilities and palliative care leaders strongly opposed the bill.

The Euthanasia Prevention Coalition supports the efforts of Vivre dans la Dignité (Living with Dignity) and the Physicians Alliance Against Euthanasia who intend to challenge Bill 52 in the Courts as unconstitutional.

Killing is not Caring.

Euthanasia is Lethal.


For more information contact:
Alex Schadenberg, 
Executive Director - 
Euthanasia Prevention Coalition 
at: 1-877-439-3348 or 519-851-1434 (Cell) or info@epcc.ca

Nicolas Steenhout, Executive Director - Vivre dans la Dignité/Living with Dignity 

Thursday, May 22, 2014

Québec euthanasia Bill 52 is imprecise and open to abuse.

By Alex Schadenberg
Executive Director - Euthanasia Prevention Coalition

The Québec government re-introduced Bill 52 at the stage that it was at before the Québec election.

Since the Supreme Court of Canada will hear a euthanasia case on October 15, the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition (EPC) asks why has the Québec government decided to re-introduce a euthanasia bill and why are they determined to pass the bill so quickly? what's the rush?

Sign the petition: Québec's euthanasia Bill is lethal.

EPC and its Québec counterparts want you to know:

• Euthanasia is defined as homicide in the federal Criminal Code. The bill defines killing by lethal injection as "health care" in order to avoid the Criminal Code prohibition.  
• The bill gave Québec doctors the right to lethally inject their patients for physical or psychological suffering and it does not define psychological suffering. 
• The bill does not limit euthanasia to terminally ill people. It states that a person must be “at the end of life” but the bill does not define end of life.   
• The bill targets people with disabilities. It states that a person must be in “an advanced state of irreversible decline in capability.” Many people with disabilities fit these criteria. Since the bill does not define "end of life" euthanasia will be extended to people with disabilities.
Bill 52 is imprecise and open to abuse.
Bill 52 is unconstitutional and will be challenged in the court.
Bill is lethal.

For more information contact:
Nic Steenhout (Montreal) Vivre dans la Dignité (438) 931-1233 – info@vivredignite.com
Alex Schadenberg (London) Euthanasia Prevention Coalition (519) 851-1434 – info@epcc.ca
Amy Hasbrouck (Montreal) Toujours Vivant-Not Dead Yet: (450) 921-3057 – info@tv-ndy.ca

Wednesday, May 21, 2014

Quebec Euthanasia Bill (May 22) Press Conference


Rushed adoption of Bill 52: 
a parody of democracy that invites legal challenges

MONTREAL, May 21, 2014 

Media representatives are invited to a joint press conference with the Physicians’ Alliance against Euthanasia and the citizen network Living with Dignity. At this time, the spokespersons of both groups will announce their intention to challenge the possible adoption of Bill 52 by the National Assembly. The spokespersons will be available to answer questions.

When: Thursday, May 22, 2014 
Statements (14h) Opportunity for interviews (14h 15 à 15h)

Where: Vie autonome Montréal 
2120, rue Sherbrooke East, room 402

Sources: The citizen network Living with Dignity (http://vivredignite.org/en/) and the Physicians’ Alliance against Euthanasia (http://totalrefusal.blogspot.ca).

For further information or to organize an interview with a spokesperson, please contact:

Nicolas Steenhout
Director General
Living with Dignity
info@vivredignite.com
438-931-1233


- Sign the online petition: Québec's euthanasia Bill 52 is lethal.
- Québec's euthanasia bill is unconstitutional, imprecise and lethal.

Saturday, May 10, 2014

Botched Execution and Euthanasia.

By Nic Steenhout, originally published by Mercatornet on May 4, 2014.

Nic Steenhout
It is false that “medical aid in dying” always provides a quiet death. No, euthanasia is a violent gesture, for the person killed as well as for the physician.

Those who wish to legalise “medical aid in dying” state that we must give an easier death for those at end of life. They say that euthanasia is the way to do it. However, there are clear indications that euthanasia often is a rather violent death.

Let’s take the recent cases of two death-row inmates, Clayton Lockett and Dennis McGuire, where the execution by lethal injection went extremely badly. Lockett took 26 minutes to die. Witnesses say that he was gasping for breath the whole time. McGuire died more than an hour after the injection, from a heart attack, after the injection ruptured a vein, botching the execution. Yet, it is the executioner’s job to conduct these procedures properly.

I hesitate to compare humans to animals, but there are plenty of stories of botched euthanasia for cats and dogs – as shown by a quick Google search. Yet, veterinarians do these procedures regularly.

But there are also documented cases of botched assisted suicides. David Reinard tells the story of a man who woke up three days after taking a lethal prescription, or the case of a man who had to “help” the dying person after they started vomiting and becoming very agitated.

Death by euthanasia, by “medical aid in dying”, by assisted suicide, or by lethal injection may be extremely violent for the dying person. But it is also violent for the physician that conducts the act. Marie de Hennezel, a French psychologist, psychotherapist and author eloquently speaks about it:
“As a psychologist, I have been for the past twenty years the confidante of many doctors and nurses having euthanized a patient. I can bear witness to the violence that this radical act represents: it is a source of prolonged nightmares and some, haunted by the last look of the patient to whom they have given death, are dragged into unending depressions. We have to become aware of the weight that this can represent for them”.
We must be conscious of the facts. Euthanasia does not guarantee a quiet, dignified and painless death. If we truly want to help people at end-of-life, we must improve access to palliative care.

Nicolas Steenhout is Executive Director at Vivre Dans La Dignité, in Québec.

Saturday, February 15, 2014

Québec doctors are expanding who qualifies for lethal injections (euthanasia).

On February 13, 2014 the National Post published an article, by Graeme Hamilton, explaining that Quebec's doctors are planning to extend the euthanasia law, even before it has become law.

Sign the petition: Québec's euthanasia Bill 52 is lethal.


The National Post article stated:
Quebec’s National Assembly is set to begin final adoption next week of a law that will legalize euthanasia in the province, making it the first jurisdiction in North America to allow physicians to deliberately end patients’ lives.
And as Bill 52 moves forward with support across party lines and among a majority of Quebecers, the province’s College of Physicians is already envisaging a day when some of the bill’s restrictions on euthanasia will need to be loosened.
“This bill, as it is right now, it’s probably a landmark but surely not the end of the reflection,” said Yves Robert, secretary of the College, which supports the bill. “It’s only a step. There are many questions that are still unanswered.”
As Quebecers become accustomed to doctors administering lethal injections to dying patients, the questions will not be about who is receiving euthanasia but who is being denied it, Dr. Robert said.
He raised the example of a patient suffering from advanced Alzheimer’s disease who would not be eligible for euthanasia under the Quebec law because he is no longer legally capable of giving consent. Another example is the requirement that patients be adults, meaning those under 18 who are terminally ill and suffering would not be eligible.
“We will have to think about that, not only for [incapable] adults but obviously for youngsters who face terminal diseases,” Dr. Robert said.
Nicolas Steenhout
Under Bill 52, in addition to being an adult and mentally fit, a patient seeking euthanasia — the bill calls it “medical aid in dying” — must suffer from an incurable serious illness and be in constant and unbearable physical or psychological pain. He must also be in an advanced state of irreversible decline and be at the end of life.
Veronique Hivon, Québec's Junior Health Minister thinks that Bill 52 is very restrictive, but Nic Steenhout, the director-general of the group Vivre dans la Dignité in Quebec stated: 
 “Considering that Bill 52 is so closely modelled after the law in Belgium and considering that there has been a lot of abuse in Belgium in the last 10 years … we are certainly concerned about the possibility of that happening in Quebec,”
His group recently launched a video featuring physicians opposed to Bill 52, including Balfour Mount, considered a world pioneer of palliative care. Dr. Mount said there is no need for euthanasia because suffering can be minimized through palliative care. It would be a “disastrous mistake” to legalize euthanasia, he warned.
“Legalizing euthanasia places at risk the most vulnerable among us, the elderly, the handicapped, those unable to speak for themselves, those who feel they’re a burden to their loved ones,” he said.
Link to a similar article: