My story: No to MAiD for Mental Illness.

The following true story was sent to our EPC "Story Contest."

You can visit our "contributor info" (Link) "recent stories" (Link) and "story index" (Link). All formats are welcome, especially short videos. We would be thrilled to receive your story at: story@epcc.ca

By Peter Oliver

My Condition

Peter Oliver

I'm a 61-year-old man and I have experienced depression for more than forty years. It is chronic, meaning that it is a long-term condition and there is no reason to believe it will ever be relieved. It is also constant, meaning that there is never an occasion when I do not feel some level of depression. It is sometimes debilitating, meaning that profound feelings of tiredness, hopelessness, pessimism, despair and self-critical thinking become so overwhelming that, on some occasions, I must withdraw to a darkened room for several hours and sit quietly until these harmful feelings lighten up.

Interventions

Over the last 40 plus years, I have had the support of 4 psychologists and 1 psychiatrist who have provided quite literally 100s of hours of professional support. Medications, exercise, meditation, cognitive-behavioral therapy, supportive community, proper diet, reading, hobbies, journaling and prayer are all part of the regime of interventions that play a role in addressing my condition. Despite the disciplined and sustained attention to these interventions my depression remains constant, chronic and sometimes debilitating.

My Life

My wife and I have been happily married for 30 years, and we have three adult children. All of our children have completed university educations, and they are beginning to establish stable living situations. Two of them experience significant levels of mental distress.

My professional formation includes studies in psychiatric nursing, a philosophy degree, and a Masters degree in pastoral theology. I have worked in a variety of labor positions (farm, factory, construction) have acted as a care aid to a man dying from MS, have been a camp councillor for children who have disabilities, been a teacher's assistant in support of severely disabled children, acted as a pastoral assistant in a Roman Catholic parish, provided chaplaincy services in both provincial and federal corrections, and currently, I am the Executive Director of the Catholic Health Association of Saskatchewan.

Approximately 8 years ago I was diagnosed with colon cancer. This was successfully treated by a partial colectomy. My wife wittily says, he used to have a colon now he has a semicolon (ha, ha).

While still in the hospital and in a particularly vulnerable state, arising from being twenty-five days without food, I was informed that my employment was terminated. Recovery from the surgery and finding a new avenue for employment took a full year.

I include this because it seems important to recognize that mental health challenges are further complicated by other life events.

Family of Origin

My father, a farmer, who worked hard and did his best to love his family, was deeply, chronically and constantly depressed as well. He did not have any of the assistance that I have been privileged to receive. It was a mood disorder which found expression in ruminative behaviour (in hours of swearing throughout the night), rejection of bathing, angry outbursts, and paralyzed communication. These were some of the primary ingredients of my childhood.

He died at 73 (unlike his other 5 siblings who live into their 80s and 90s) and I would submit that depression was a significant contributor to his earlier death.

My mother, born during the second world war, and a person of remarkable grit, struggled mightily with the challenges of my father’s mental health but successfully navigated them, raising six children who have become contributing members of our country in farming, healthcare, the service industry, and pastoral care.

Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD)

The Government of Canada website on assisted suicide, euphemistically referred to as Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) states: 

"Important: On February 29, 2024, legislation to extend the temporary exclusion of eligibility to receive MAID in circumstances where a person's sole underlying medical condition is a mental illness received royal assent and immediately came into effect. The eligibility date for persons suffering solely from a mental illness is now March 17, 2027.”

As of March 17, 2027, I will qualify to be assessed for assisted suicide. The primary issue would be, do I find the depression I experience intolerable? It is fair to say, I could make an excellent case for a positive assessment.

So, allow me be blunt about the implication of these changes.

A positive assessment would mean, the Government of Canada believes that a legitimate response to my condition is to have a medical professional inject a poisonous substance into my arm causing my death.

Sign our EPC petition: No MAiD for Mental Illness (Link).

I Am Offended

With many other people from the mental health and disability community, I AM OFFENDED!  

The Government of Canada, which is charged with the responsibility of fostering the fullness of life for its citizens, is prepared to activate legislation that says, "We agree with you. You would be better off dead!" 

After years of disciplined and constructive action in relation to my condition, am I now to live in a country that invests millions of dollars employing the services of medical professionals who will end the lives of people "whose sole underlying medical condition is a mental illness"? Am I now to live in a country that clearly states in word and action, “some depressed people are better off dead”?

Expectations

What I expect from the government of Canada is a resounding message and actions that say, "We stand on guard for you." We strive to build a nation of courageous people who can meet affliction, ordeal, and privation with fortitude. Where no individual is thought of as “better off dead”. 

As the saying goes, you can't serve two masters. One you will honour and one you will despise. You cannot build a great nation that simultaneously expects its medical professionals to provide healing, hope, and encouragement while also supporting legislation that provides a mandate for doctors and nurses to kill depressed patients. The result is inevitable, our citizen’s respect for people with mental health concerns will erode and our nation will begin to glorify assisted suicide.

As a person whose family has struggled with mental health, whose children strive to meet mental health concerns, and who daily meets the challenges of a mental health condition, this is not what we need and not what we want!

*Sharing a story about your struggle with mental illness is difficult but it is necessary for supporting Bill C-218 that will prevent MAiD for Mental Illness alone.

Sign our EPC petition: No MAiD for Mental Illness (Link).

Should caregivers be forced to starve dementia patients to death?

This article was published by National Review online on August 5, 2025.

Wesley Smith

By Wesley J Smith

First, Caplan discusses the potential withholding of feeding tubes (artificial hydration and nutrition, or AHN, in medical parlance), which is unquestionably legal because AHN is a medical treatment that involves surgery and medically prepared nutrients and — like other treatments, ranging from surgery to chemotherapy — can be ordered through advance directives to be withheld or withdrawn. Right or wrong, that’s a done deal. (He brings up the Terri Schiavo case, about which he and I significantly disagree, but let’s not relitigate that here.)

Then, however, Caplan takes the next step — which is currently on the cutting edge of bioethical discourse. From “Artificial Hydration and Nutrition in Dementia: Ethicist Weighs In”:

Is feeding by spoon the same as medical intervention with artificial forms of hydration and nutrition? I believe it is. I believe that when you say “no more food and nutrition,” it isn’t just the equipment. I’ll put it simply: It’s who’s on the end of the spoon. If nurses or doctors are feeding, it’s medical. It’s professional care, and you should be able to say no to that.

Spoon-feeding has always been considered humane care, akin to keeping patients warm, maintaining proper standards of hygiene, and turning patients to prevent bedsores. A redefinition of spoon-feeding, it seems to me, would be a radical change in medical ethics. Should a nurse’s cleaning a patient, for example, also now be considered a medical treatment? I can’t imagine it.

Spoon-feeding isn’t a medical procedure. It doesn’t take a medical professional’s education or training to do it. Food and liquids aren’t medicine. We are talking about canned peaches, cottage cheese, soup, or eggs. We are talking about water, juice, tea, and coffee. Good grief, I spoon-fed my mother when she was dying of Alzheimer’s, and it didn’t take any special skill or training on my part. Should I have been charged with practicing medicine or nursing without a license?

Next, Caplan believes that the desires of the once-competent person should rule, even if the now-incompetent person willingly eats:

I do think if someone says “I don’t want to eat or drink anymore,” their intent and their values are clear. You could certainly rediscuss it with the family and say she seems to be accepting food and swallowing, and ask if that changes their mind or makes them think she might have decided differently.

However, I think the wishes of the competent person, when they made the living will, are what should drive care if the person loses competency. They thought about it, they knew where they were headed, and I do think that’s the value that ought to dominate thinking about whether we have to continue to try food and water for nutrition.

Let’s think about this deeply. Wouldn’t this dehumanize the now-incompetent person by making him or her less than equal? And wouldn’t this be a real “gotcha,” because once a person became incompetent, then even in non-medical cases — many dementia patients really enjoy eating; Mom sure did — their desires and joys would matter not a whit?

We sure push hastened death these days. We have widespread legalization of assisted suicide. We have VSED — whereby doctors help people starve themselves to death. We have VSED “as a bridge” to assisted suicide/euthanasia, by weakening a patient so that he or she can qualify for hastened death. We have proposals to intentionally malnourish dementia patients, who desired it when competent, so that they die slowly over time. And now, a very influential bioethicist supports forcing caregivers to cause death by dehydration and starvation, even when a patient willingly eats.

Before we go down this road, shouldn’t we ask ourselves: Aren’t there some actions that we don’t have a right to demand from others? If so, isn’t starving and dehydrating a helpless patient who willingly eats — and who could even be asking for food — one such action?

If you did such a thing to a dog, you would go to jail. When will we say, “Enough: This is too much to ask”?

Previous articles by or concerning Wesley Smith (Link).