Executive Director, Euthanasia Prevention Coalition
On June 7, The Physicians’ Alliance against Euthanasia joined with the Living with Dignity citizen network to express their great disappointment that Bill 11, An Act to amend the Act respecting end-of-life care and other legislative provisions was passed in the Québec legislature.
The Physicians' Alliance and Living with Dignity reported that Bill 11 will expand euthanasia in Québec in the following ways:
- creating an obligation for palliative care homes to offer MAID (in 6 months);
- offering MAID in cases of serious physical disability* (in 9 months);
- offering MAID by advance request* (in a maximum of 24 months).
- *together with the other criteria of the Act respecting end-of-life care.
Lee Harding, writing for the Epoch Times, was published on June 13, 2023 concerning the fact that Bill 11, which recently passed in Québec, forces palliative care institutions in Québec to provide euthanasia. Harding reported:
A new Quebec law that mandates palliative care facilities to provide medical assistance in dying has drawn criticism from euthanasia opponents and a palliative care advocate.
Bill 11 to expand medical assistance in dying (MAiD) passed in Quebec’s national assembly on June 7.
Harding reported that the Living With Dignity citizens network were particularly bothered by the requirement that all palliative care institutions would provide euthanasia. Harding reports:
The organization said it was even more “deeply disturbed” by a late amendment to the bill. Sonia Belanger, minister for health and seniors, added the provision that a hospice “cannot refuse to receive a person for the sole reason that the latter has submitted a request for medical assistance in dying” and created a deadline of six months for palliative care homes to comply.Harding reported Dr. Catherine Ferrier, a board member for Living with Dignity, as stating:
Although only four palliative care hospices are known to not wish to offer MAiD, the government approach to admission criteria was opposed by the Alliance of Palliative Care Homes of Quebec during public consultations.
“It is of course very bad news that the law passed with such a big majority of votes. Politicians in Quebec seem to think that expansion of euthanasia is inevitable and that their role is to make it safe. It’s seen as an act of compassion,” Ferrier told The Epoch Times via email.
“But it is never safe and is an act of abandonment of the patient.”
Alex Schadenberg |
...patients had access to MAiD before the law, and the change only forces palliative care homes to become active participants.
“It’s a serious issue for conscience rights because now every palliative care institution is going to have to offer this,” Schadenberg said in an interview.
“There were a couple of palliative care institutions that were created more recently, meaning after the legalization of euthanasia they were created specifically because they wouldn’t offer it and they were trying to provide what we would call a safe space.”
Angelina Ireland |
“Palliative care is a 50-year medical discipline that is very clear about what it entails, and it never includes MAiD and never includes euthanasia, and the father of palliative care, Dr. Balfour Mount, is from McGill University. So it’s very ironic in this moment that Quebec is moving in that direction,” Ireland said.
“This political movement is forcing a coercive makeover of what palliative care is. They’ll scream up and down that it’s about human rights, but it looks more like a cull to me because we’ve opened up Pandora’s Box. And when they just promised it’s only a little bit of MAiD, it’s turned out to be something that every vulnerable Canadian has to be afraid of.”
Ireland said the precedent in B.C. suggests that those morally opposed to the imposition of euthanasia will exit the profession, but the palliative care facilities will remain.
In February, the Québec Euthanasia Commission announced that euthanasia represented 7% of all 2022 deaths in Québec which represents the highest rate of euthanasia in the world.
10 comments:
So one freedom, the freedom to kill patients by assisted suicide, overshadows a freedom not to participate. In other words, the freedom of dissent is abrogated by the act of referral and enforced participation. In short: the one freedom to kill removes freedom to not participate. Ideologically, that makes everyone complicit. The effect of that is such that if anyone participates, and then 'gets a conscience' afterward, that person will be asked, "Why did you participate if you didn't like it?" See how ideology works?
How long before euthanasia will no longer be a choice, but mandatory in our godless bureaucracies?
Many policies go under the radar which we are not aware of. I live in a small town in BC where we have three doctors who provide ‘Maid’ services.
I personally know one of them and of two occasions where euthanasia was offered to elderly patients who were receiving palliative care at home.
While I am not completely opposed to MAiD, having been associated with the hospice movement for 18+ years, I am firmly opposed to hospice facilities being forced by the Québec government to comply. This is so totally against the philosophy and goals of hospice care in the End-of-Life context.
I'm thinking that there might possibly be a link between the medical professionals (doctors and nurses) who are retiring or leaving their professions because of the assault on their right not to choose to participate in euthanizing patients. The medical field is fast losing honour and respect. Many elderly are justifiably concerned about even going into a nursing home now, much less the unfortunate possibility of needing to occupy a hospital bed. We are all afraid and have lost trust in the people who took an oath to care for them. How is it that politicians have abdicated their role as protectors of our country and have instead decided to play God? They have been trying to put God out of business for a long time. Sad.
Horrifying and very dangerous. I very much hope the new law will be challenged in court.
Does the law except facilities run by religious organizations that believe in the commandment Though Shalt Not Kill?
Hopefully Canadian Jewish and Christian organizations will boldly challenge this unjust law.
Cold blooded murder is the real term for euthansia. False compassion: we love you so much that
we will kill you, or help you to kill yourself.
The reason for these government policies is to reduce spending for the care of disabled and severely sick people. Much the same as the Nazis T4 program; get rid of the useless eaters.
It is a real shame that only four palliative care places do not want to murder their patients.
All true palliaive care places would never take part in this crime.
Daniel Largy
Nuremberg trial said you must not obey to bad orders. Nazi leaders said they just execute HITLER's orders.
While not completely opposed to MAiD, I strongly oppose the Québec government’s coercing hospice/palliative care facilities to provide MAiD. Having been associated with hospice/palliative care for 18+ yesterday in Québec, I know that the philosophy in such facilities is so different when it comes to providing End-of-Life care.
I sure hope that the hospices and palliative care centres will have the courage to refuse to offer MAiD even if the law "forces" them to. As a previous post said, "remember the Nuremberg trials".
How can somebody like 'Unknown' (above) be sitting on the fence about MAiD?
Is it because of $$$ for 18 years? Money talks, eh, also in the killing fields?
Post a Comment