Executive Director, Euthanasia Prevention Coalition
The Ontario Office of the Chief Coroner recently released new MAID data (euthanasia and assisted suicide deaths).
The number of assisted deaths, in Ontario, continues to increase. From June 17, 2016 to September 30, 2020, there were 6059 reported assisted deaths with 1741 reported assisted deaths in 2020 already representing 1127 in the first six months and 614 in the last three months of 2020, now averaging more than 200 assisted deaths per month in Ontario.
The number of assisted deaths, in Ontario, continues to increase. From June 17, 2016 to September 30, 2020, there were 6059 reported assisted deaths with 1741 reported assisted deaths in 2020 already representing 1127 in the first six months and 614 in the last three months of 2020, now averaging more than 200 assisted deaths per month in Ontario.
In July, 2020, Health Canada released the first annual report on (MAiD) euthanasia and assisted suicide. The data was gathered from the reports submitted by the medical practitioners who caused the death. There is no requirement that a third party or neutral person submit the euthanasia reports to ensure accuracy.
Article: Analysis of Canada's 2019 MAiD annual report (Link).
The report provided information on the 2019 Canadian MAiD deaths. According to the report:
- In 2019, there were 5,631 MAID deaths reported in Canada, up from 4467 in 2018, accounting for 2.0% of all deaths.
- The number of cases of MAID in 2019 represented an increase of 26.1% over 2018 with every province experiencing a steady growth in the number of cases of MAID since its introduction into law in 2016.
- When all data sources are considered, the total of number of medically assisted deaths reported in Canada from legalization until December 31, 2019 was 13,946.
Based on the fact that the Health Canada report indicated that there were 5631 reported MAID deaths in 2019. It is reasonable to estimate that there have been approximately 19,000 assisted deaths in Canada since legalization.
Bill C-7 will lead to more death.
Sign the Petition: Reject euthanasia Bill C-7 (Link).
In September 2019, Quebec Superior Court Justice Baudouin, struck down the requirement in Canada's euthanasia law that a person's natural death be reasonably foreseeable and the court gave the federal government six months to amend the law based on the Truchon court decision. The government did not appeal the decision.
On February 24, the federal government introduced Bill C-7 in response to the Quebec Court decision striking down the requirement in the law that a person’s "natural death be reasonably foreseeable" before qualifying to be killed. Due to the prorogation of parliament, Bill C-7 was re-introduced on October 5, 2020.
What changes does Bill C-7 make to the law?
1. Bill C-7 removes the requirement in the law that a person’s natural death must be reasonably foreseeable to qualify for death by lethal injection. Therefore, people who are not terminally ill can die by euthanasia. The Quebec court decision only required this amendment to the law, but Bill C-7 went further.
2. Bill C-7 permits a doctor or nurse practitioner to lethally inject a person who is incapable of consenting, if that person was previously approved for assisted death. This contravenes the Supreme Court of Canada Carter decision which stated that only competent people could die by euthanasia.
3. Bill C-7 waives the ten-day waiting period when a person is deemed to be “terminally ill.” A person could request death by euthanasia on a "bad day" and die the same day. Studies prove that the “will to live” fluctuates.
4. Bill C-7 creates a two track law. A person who is deemed to be terminally ill would have no waiting period while a person who is not terminally ill will have a 90 day waiting period before being killed by lethal injection.
If Bill C-7 is passed, a future court decision will strike down the 90 day waiting period for people whose natural death is not reasonably foreseeable because, it would be argued that this provision represents an inequality in the law.
5. Bill C-7 falsely claims to prevent euthanasia for people with mental illness. The euthanasia law permits MAiD for people who are physically or psychologically suffering that is intolerable to the person and that cannot be relieved in a way that the person considers acceptable.” However, mental illness, which is not defined in the law, is considered a form of psychological suffering.
If the government wants to exclude euthanasia for mental illness, Bill C-7 would need to define psychological suffering in a manner that excludes euthanasia for mental illness.
Bill C-7 permits anyone who believes that their physical or psychological suffering to be intolerable to qualify for death by lethal injection, even if effective medical treatments for their condition exists, with a 90 day waiting period. (Link to Bill C-7)
The Canadian government must reject Bill C-7 and begin the promised 5-year review of the euthanasia law with an open view to what is actually happening rather than continuing to expand euthanasia, making Canada the most permissive euthanasia regime in the world.
Bill C-7 will lead to more death.
Sign the Petition: Reject euthanasia Bill C-7 (Link).
In September 2019, Quebec Superior Court Justice Baudouin, struck down the requirement in Canada's euthanasia law that a person's natural death be reasonably foreseeable and the court gave the federal government six months to amend the law based on the Truchon court decision. The government did not appeal the decision.
On February 24, the federal government introduced Bill C-7 in response to the Quebec Court decision striking down the requirement in the law that a person’s "natural death be reasonably foreseeable" before qualifying to be killed. Due to the prorogation of parliament, Bill C-7 was re-introduced on October 5, 2020.
What changes does Bill C-7 make to the law?
1. Bill C-7 removes the requirement in the law that a person’s natural death must be reasonably foreseeable to qualify for death by lethal injection. Therefore, people who are not terminally ill can die by euthanasia. The Quebec court decision only required this amendment to the law, but Bill C-7 went further.
2. Bill C-7 permits a doctor or nurse practitioner to lethally inject a person who is incapable of consenting, if that person was previously approved for assisted death. This contravenes the Supreme Court of Canada Carter decision which stated that only competent people could die by euthanasia.
3. Bill C-7 waives the ten-day waiting period when a person is deemed to be “terminally ill.” A person could request death by euthanasia on a "bad day" and die the same day. Studies prove that the “will to live” fluctuates.
4. Bill C-7 creates a two track law. A person who is deemed to be terminally ill would have no waiting period while a person who is not terminally ill will have a 90 day waiting period before being killed by lethal injection.
If Bill C-7 is passed, a future court decision will strike down the 90 day waiting period for people whose natural death is not reasonably foreseeable because, it would be argued that this provision represents an inequality in the law.
5. Bill C-7 falsely claims to prevent euthanasia for people with mental illness. The euthanasia law permits MAiD for people who are physically or psychologically suffering that is intolerable to the person and that cannot be relieved in a way that the person considers acceptable.” However, mental illness, which is not defined in the law, is considered a form of psychological suffering.
If the government wants to exclude euthanasia for mental illness, Bill C-7 would need to define psychological suffering in a manner that excludes euthanasia for mental illness.
Bill C-7 permits anyone who believes that their physical or psychological suffering to be intolerable to qualify for death by lethal injection, even if effective medical treatments for their condition exists, with a 90 day waiting period. (Link to Bill C-7)
The Canadian government must reject Bill C-7 and begin the promised 5-year review of the euthanasia law with an open view to what is actually happening rather than continuing to expand euthanasia, making Canada the most permissive euthanasia regime in the world.
4 comments:
Amazing, isn't it ? From the severely limited exercise of an exceptional choice (which we were promised) to the default normality of universally guaranteed, institutionally standard "care" (which we now observe).
What possible explanation (let alone justification) can there be ?
Dare we even ask the question ? Are we ready to deal with the truths which will likely be revealed ?
Best,
Gordon Friesen, Montreal
http://www.euthanasiediscussion.net/
The reality of things is that we currently live in a country which promotes the culture of death... If at all possible, we must vote for pro-life political candidates who will be brave enough to promote the culture of LIFE! God bless you, Dr. Gordon!
Equality appears to be of no consequence. If a person is "damaged" let them go their way??? This is flawed logic! Many people reach a crisis point at some time in their life. Some even experience many. The definition of the term "disability" interests me. Is it based upon a scale of uselessness?
All human life has value. Those who believe they have nothing to offer to others in terms of life experience have misunderstood the idea of usefulness. If we simply allow a group of people to 'disappear' from among the human race, who will teach the younger set who face the same challenges but wish to live? Do we just usher them along the same fateful track -- affirming they are of no use to the rest of us? Shameful!
Who empowered politicians and doctors to make these kinds of decisions? They are paid to do their best for our citizens, and not their least -- which is what Bill C7 allows them to do. Alexander the Great came upon a regiment of soldiers who were resting from battle. He told them that "Greeks do not rest until the battle is done. Get back to the fight, to change your name."
We could say the same to our politicians and doctors -- either get back into the business pf doing your best for our citizens or get a new job. Euthanasia is purely lazy and cost saving.
We don’t need to suffer I want the freedom to die. I cant keep suffering like this and only to take my own life which is deemed illegal and be a burden. I would like the freedom to die! I’ll pay for it! Not everyone is fortunate or feels fortunate to be in this world some of us like the option to have freedom to choose death so we don’t inconvenience others with suicide.
Post a Comment