Thursday, June 29, 2023

Organ donation procedure violates the dead donor rule

Alex Schadenberg
Executive Director, Euthanasia Prevention Coalition

On October 20, 2022, I wrote an article entitled: New Organ transplant procedure violates the dead donor rule where I explain why Normothermic Regional Perfusion organ donation violates the dead donor rule. 

On June 2, 2023 the Journal of the American Medical Association published an article by Troug et al, explaining how Normothermic Regional Perfusion works, why there are ethical objections to it, yet heralding this new organ donation technique as possibly  "The Next Frontier in Organ Donation".

Robert Troug, the lead author of this article, is a long-time proponent of dropping the dead donor rule for organ donation. (Article 1) (Article 2) (Article 3)

The article explains how Normothermic Regional Perfusion is done:
The donation after circulatory death–normothermic regional perfusion method differs from standard donation after circulatory death in that perfusion to the organs is restored in situ before they are removed. In normothermic regional perfusion, immediately after death is declared, surgeons perform a sternotomy, place cannulas into the right atrium and the descending aorta, clamp the brachiocephalic arteries to occlude blood flow to the brain, and use an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) machine to initiate warm perfusion to all of the organs. Once ECMO perfusion is established, the perfused organs typically start to regain function inside the donor’s body: the heart beats, the liver makes bile and clears lactate, the kidneys produce urine, and the donor may even be weaned off ECMO. This procedure allows time for the organs to be monitored and optimized before removal and transplant.
This means that once the heart stops beating for 5 minutes and the person is declared dead, the organ donation team will then block the blood flow to the brain and restart the heart to enable normal organ function. 

These people are being intentionally made 'brain dead' in order to be used as organ donors.

Troug states that those who support Normothermic Regional Perfusion believe that they are fulfilling the circulatory death protocol, with the only difference being that after the person is declared dead, the heart is restarted to ensure that the organs remain healthy.

Troug explains that those who oppose Normothermic Regional Perfusion argue that the only reason the person is not resuscitated in the first place is that the person has agreed to be an organ donor. Troug explains:
Critics insist that restoring circulation with ECMO does indeed reverse the very criteria by which the patient was declared to be dead and that once supported on ECMO, patients no longer fulfill the circulatory criteria for death. Proponents disagree, noting that cerebral circulation had ceased for 5 minutes during the hands-off period and was prevented from being restored by the clamping of the brachiocephalic vessels, inevitably leading to a state of brain death. Yet this response has been criticized because (1) it seems to switch the criteria by which death is determined from circulatory to neurological, and (2) the determination of death by neurological criteria requires a number of specific examinations and tests that cannot be completed within the timeframe of donation after circulatory death-normothermic regional perfusion.
Troug opposes the dead donor rule and he supports Normothermic Regional Perfusion. Troug does repeat the concerns with the new organ donation technique, but he states:
The donation after circulatory death–normothermic regional perfusion procedure offers an unprecedented opportunity to improve both the number and quality of organs procured from donation after circulatory death. Faced with a growing waiting list, a commitment to saving as many lives as possible, and increasing scrutiny and regulatory pressures, many in the transplant community are eager to embrace normothermic regional perfusion.
Normothermic Regional Perfusion bi-passes the dead donor rule by allowing an organ donor to die, even though the person may have been able to live, in order to harvest healthy organs. It is not that death first occurs, rather death is made to occur, for the purpose of organ donation.

The dead donor rule is being circumvented in order to provide more organs for donation.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

This is murder in a sense since many persons have died and are brought back to life even after longer periods of time. To intentionally starve a persons brain of oxygen is criminal!! We must warn people not to approve this procedure and even list that fact on their medical directives!!

Wendy Martin said...

I have signed my donor card and now I am removing it. Most of my organs will not qualify anyways as a diabetic but to think you are able to restart the heart after death and not allow the person to live is a very ethical question. I will have to say murder by the choice of the doctor. I know people need transplants and donors. I believe God has a purpose for each person and natural death. I am really sad to read this article as it seems you are putting someone else's life ahead of a person who could have been saved but let to die just to get the organs. If I decide to keep my donor card my children will be instructed in my living will not to allow this procedure. In God I trust

Alex Schadenberg said...

As I have stated before, the problem began when the dead donor rule began to be ignored.

Tan said...

" Faced with a growing waiting list, a commitment to saving as many lives as possible" -sure always under the cover/cloak of virtue. Why don't you say it to this lady: Woman facing terminal illness speaks out after being denied life-saving organ transplant due to vaccination status - https://www.rebelnews.com/woman_facing_terminal_illness_speaks_out_after_being_denied_life_saving_organ_transplant_due_to_vaccination_status?utm_campaign=sf_organtransplant_6_14_23&utm_medium=email&utm_source=therebel

Tan said...

" Faced with a growing waiting list, a commitment to saving as many lives as possible" -sure always under the cover/cloak of virtue. Why don't you say it to this lady: Woman facing terminal illness speaks out after being denied life-saving organ transplant due to vaccination status - https://www.rebelnews.com/woman_facing_terminal_illness_speaks_out_after_being_denied_life_saving_organ_transplant_due_to_vaccination_status?utm_campaign=sf_organtransplant_6_14_23&utm_medium=email&utm_source=therebel