Saturday, September 8, 2018

Is euthanasia psychiatric treatment?

Alex Schadenberg
Executive Director - Euthanasia Prevention Coalition


Dr. Damiaan Denys

Damiaan Denys M.D. Ph.D., the President of the Dutch Society of Psychiatrists wrote a commentary that was published in the September issue of The American Journal of Psychiatry titled: Is Euthanasia Psychiatric Treatment?

Commentaries on psychiatric euthanasia by experts, like Denys, are incredibly important for countries, such as Canada, who are considering extending euthanasia to people with psychiatric conditions.


Denys commentary is based on a 42-year-old married woman, while receiving psychiatric treatment requested death by euthanasia. The Psychiatric team, that Denys is a member, disapproved her death by euthanasia because treatment options existed but the woman died by euthanasia anyway. Denys wrote:
Although we had treated her intensively for 2 years, our advice was disregarded. Eight weeks later we received the obituary of the patient.
Denys commentary then goes further into the dilemma of psychiatric euthanasia. He states:
Apart from controversy about the primary question, whether euthanasia is an option for psychiatric patients, there are medical and ethical dilemmas related to the practical process of decision making and execution. How can we reconcile the daily practice of reducing suicidal ideas and behaviors in patients with respecting a death wish in single cases? How can we distinguish between symptoms and existential needs? How can we decide whether a psychiatrist is sufficiently autonomous to judge euthanasia? Does the fragile therapeutic relationship between psychiatrist and patient not bias judgment? How are differences in opinion between psychiatrist and patient resolved? Although psychiatrists are not legally obliged to approve or execute euthanasia, neither can they interfere once a request is granted by a third party, as illustrated in the aforementioned case.
Denys then states that the number of psychiatrists who oppose euthanasia is growing in the Netherlands:
The powerlessness psychiatrists may feel when facing a euthanasia request may be comprehended as moral distress. ... Paradoxically, although the number of requests has increased in the Netherlands, psychiatrists have become more reluctant toward euthanasia. In 1995, 53% of psychiatrists found it inconceivable to ever consider euthanasia; in 2015, 63% of psychiatrists rejected euthanasia.

Denys completes his commentary by stating:
Finally, the possibility of euthanasia may lower many people’s threshold for ending their lives. The legalization of euthanasia not only appears to justify morally the intention to die, it also institutes suppliers of the services who encourage the demand for euthanasia. 
Whatever stance one takes in the euthanasia debate, albeit good or bad, right or wrong, in the end, there is a terminal effect. Euthanasia for psychiatric disorders is an infinite debate with finite consequences.

No comments:

Printfriendly