Alex Schadenberg
Executive Director, Euthanasia Prevention Coalition
Sign the Petition: I oppose US federal funding for assisted suicide (Link).
Maggie Hroncich |
For nearly 30 years — since Oregon became the first state to legalize physician-assisted death — Congress has prevented federal funding such as Medicare from being used by patients to pay for the practice. A bill proposed by Democratic lawmakers seeks to change that.The sponsors of the bill, Democratic Representatives Brittany Pettersen and Scott Peters released a draft discussion which states:
In 1997, Congress passed the Assisted Suicide Funding Restriction Act, which prohibits using federal funds to provide for any health care services that assisted in someone’s death, including “assisting in the suicide, euthanasia, or mercy killing of any individual.”
“Medical aid-in-dying, an authorized medical practice, is not euthanasia, mercy killing, or assisted suicide,” a draft discussion of the new “Patient Access to End of Life Care Act’’ obtained by the Sun reads.In other words Petterson and Peters intend to get funding approved for assisted suicide by redefining assisted suicide as not being assisted suicide.
The Euthanasia Prevention Coalition is opposing the Patient Access to End of Life Care Act. Hroncich reports:
Yet, an online petition with hundreds of signatures is already forming against the proposal, noting that it “would force Americans to pay for assisted suicide (medically approved killing by poison) with their tax dollars.”Sign the Petition: I oppose US federal funding for assisted suicide (Link).
“I oppose assisted suicide and I vehemently oppose paying for medically approved killing,” the petition on Canada’s Euthanasia Prevention Coaltion writes of the American legislation. “Thank you in advance for upholding my conscience rights by not approving the use of tax dollars for killing.”
The Canadian group is outspoken in warning America not to follow its path, arguing that legalizing medically-assisted death opens a door that can’t be shut.
Who are the people in Congress supporting this? I will also email them directly. If Steve Scalese is one the link, I suspect that he is one of the sponsors. He is also a supporter of Donald Trump. The Republicans claim to be Pro-Life when actually they are Pro-Trump and Pro-Dollar wherever possible. Much I assume is Eugenics based - get rid of the inconvenient. Make them think they are being given a gratuity or a privilege. That was what the Fascists and Nazis did. It is sure bet to assume that the elitists in the US Congress are doing the same thing. Get rid of the inconvenient to make America as great. No wonder they back Trump who adulates Hitler, Stalin, Putin, and Erdogan.
ReplyDeleteWilliam Orazio Gallerizzo
No Steve Scalise is not a sponsor of the bill, but he is the leader of the Republicans in Congress.
ReplyDelete