Alex Schadenberg
Executive Director, Euthanasia Prevention Coalition
Health Minister Ernst Kuipers announced in a press release on Friday that he expects the regulation to be implemented within the year. The new guidelines will probably only apply to about five to ten children annually for whom “life termination is the only viable option to end the child's hopeless and unbearable suffering,” said Kuipers.This means that the Netherlands government plans to extend the Groningen Protocol, which applies to newborns, to children between the ages of 1 and 12, rather than amending the euthanasia legislation to include children under the age of 12.
Extending the Groningen Protocol
is very concerning because it permits euthanasia of newborns who are
experiencing current or possible future suffering. If you use the same
definitions for children under 12, there will be euthanasia deaths of
children who may have treatable conditions.
In October 2020, Netherlands Health Minister Hugo de Jonge announced that the government was planning to permit child euthanasia. According to the DutchNews.nl:
De Jonge added that current laws would not need to be amended. Rather, doctors would be exempted from prosecution for carrying out an approved euthanasia on a child.The NL Times reported today that:
Following life termination, a review committee and the Public Prosecution Service will examine whether the procedure was carried out with due care.This means that the decision will only be reviewed after the child has died.
Following the annoucement in October 2020, an effective campaign opposing child euthanasia in the Netherlands was launched by a group of Netherlands citizens and the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition. A petition with more than 100,000 people opposing child euthanasia.
I am also concerned that the Canadian govenment will decide to follow the lead of the Netherlands and also extend euthanasia to children.
There was a record number of Netherlands euthanasia deaths in 2022 with 8720 reported deaths representing a 14% increase from 2021 and 5.1% of all deaths in the Netherlands. 288 of the 8720 were based on the person having dementia.
The World Medical Association declared in 1987 a statement that was referred in 2005 stating:
“Euthanasia, that is the act of deliberately ending the life of a patient, even at the patient’s own request or at the request of close relatives, is unethical. This does not prevent the physician from respecting the desire of a patient to allow the natural process of death to follow its course in the terminal phase of sickness.”
- Euthanasia experts advocate for child euthanasia with or without consent (Link).
- New York Times article promotes infanticide (Link).
- Newsweek promotes infant euthanasia (Link).
- Euthanasia of newborns with disabilities and infanticide.
- Dutch paediatricians want to legalise euthanasia for children under 12.
- Euthanasia of babies with disabilities.
- The Groningen Protocol for euthanasia of disabled babies in the Netherlands.
As concerns your mention of the World Medical Association's position against euthanasia (from 1987), it is interesting to note that they felt it important to clarify further in 2018 (after extensive formal consultation on all continents), thus: "The WMA reiterates its strong commitment to the principles of medical ethics and that utmost respect has to be maintained for human life. Therefore, the WMA is firmly opposed to euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide."
ReplyDelete"This means that the decision will only be reviewed after the child has died."
ReplyDeleteInsidious evil.
We already do this in Canada, (illegally so far).
As if a review makes things seem "all good".
Lord have mercy on us.
May GOD our Creator help us! LORD, DELIVER US from the Satanic mindset that anyone has the right to take another person's life. That is MURDER, pure and simple.
ReplyDelete