Executive Director, Euthanasia Prevention Coalition
Kristen Holliday wrote a ground breaking article that was published in the Vancouver Sun on December 11. Holliday examines how Bill C-7, the bill to expand euthanasia in Canada, creates a situation where it is easier to die by MAiD (euthanasia) rather than receive effective medical treatment. Holliday examines several stories of deaths that were "outside" of the law.
Holliday tells us about the euthanasia death of Cheryl Lowen, who died in December 2019 by MAiD. Cheryl did not have terminal condition. Ray Chwartkowski, Lowen's brother, comments on the death of his sister. Holliday reports:
The last time Ray Chwartkowski saw his sister, Cheryl Lowen, was two days before she died in December, 2019.
On that day, he was shocked to learn that her death was scheduled, as she had been approved for medical assistance in dying, often referred to as MAID.
“She never had a diagnosis for any terminal illness,” he said. “I consider her death a total tragedy.”
Chwartkowski is convinced that his sister did not qualify for MAiD:
He said Lowen, who was 50 when she died, had a difficult childhood and struggled with physical and mental health problems throughout her life. In mid-2019, she was diagnosed with median arcuate ligament syndrome, a chronic illness that causes severe abdominal pain.
Chwartkowski said he has compassion for her pain but is certain she didn’t meet MAID’s criteria of a reasonably foreseeable death. He also questions her ability to make a well-informed decision after receiving the difficult diagnosis.
“From what I understood, she was refusing to eat, she was refusing immediate medical attention,” said Chwartkowski, adding that she also refused surgery to treat her condition.
Chwartkowski believes his sister, confronted with a chronic medical condition after a life filled with difficulty and mental health struggles, simply gave up hope.
“It’s like she just had so much heartache,” he said. “It just doesn’t make sense. She had so much going for her.”
Chwartkowski said, to his knowledge, Lowen applied for MAID twice and was denied the first time.
Alan (center) in July 2019 |
Gary said Alan was a healthy child and an excellent hockey goalie until he was diagnosed with a brain tumour at the age of 12. After two brain surgeries, he suffered from hearing loss, loss of co-ordination, and the occasional seizure. He also suffered from severe depression, said Gary.Gary is convinced that if Alan received the proper care that he would be alive today.
“After a while, he really started to withdraw from people. He’d go through cycles, wanting to die. But then, he would change his mind, find something good.”
Gary moved to Edmonton in 2011, where he works as an accountant, while Alan remained in their hometown of Chilliwack.
In 2019, when Alan was admitted to a Chilliwack hospital and his family was notified that he was scheduled to die by MAID, Gary said he was appalled. He received the news four days before his brother’s death.
He believes Alan should not have been approved under current legislation.
“He didn’t have a terminal illness, his natural death was not foreseen,” Gary said.
“Of course, we would have tried to stop it because we know that probably in a week or two he’s going to change his mind,” Gary said. “Overall, they don’t know how to handle mental illness. It’s quite obvious. There’s such a high percentage of suicide with mental illness.”
Krista Carr |
Carr said she receives calls from Canadians with physical and mental disabilities who say health providers have suggested MAID is now available to them.The question is how many stories, like Alan Nichols and Cheryl Lowen exist? How many lives have been ended by euthanasia (MAiD) rather than providing the necessary care to enable that person to live?
Carr said advocates for MAID stress the importance of personal autonomy and the right to choose. However, people living in poverty and social isolation, and those without access to treatment, sometimes feel they don’t have a real choice, she said.
“They can’t get assistance in living, but they can get quick assistance in dying,” Carr said.
The government should have tried to assess how many abuses of the current MAiD law existed before expanding the law. This could have been one of the topics examined in the Five-year review of the law that was supposed to begin in June 2020.
If you have a story, please contact info@epcc.ca
We want to help you find justice.
If you have a story, please contact info@epcc.ca
We want to help you find justice.
In such cases where there is no underlying condition that "justifies" euthanasia (within the conditions of the current law), how is the death certificate completed honestly without triggering a criminal investigation? (Of course the obvious answer is now one really cares what the law says. Euthanasia will always be seen as justified. The law is a paper-thin sham.)
ReplyDeleteWe were never noticed by maid no not ever and I was there beside my mother every day! What the hell is going on and that man means murdered after my mom. My mother had brain surgery at Royal Columbian hospital! I said I didn't want CHILLIWACK hospital because everyone warned me about CHILLIWACK hospital killing people! As soon as my mother got there they cut the tube feed and lied and said she she couldn't swallow!I put two complaints to frasier health authority and they said she was not a candidate for euthanasia! My mother lay in the morgue for three months because I demanded an autopsy!
ReplyDeleteChuck. Since MAiD is not put on the death certificate, the doctor must have come up with another cause of death, whatever that was. In the case of Alan Nichols, the death certificate was a sham.
ReplyDeleteThese two cases of medical aid in dying in people who clearly had years of life ahead of them demonstrate the need for careful scrutiny of the use of this legislation. It would have been interesting to a an independent board review these cases to see if more support from professionals, family and/or friends could have prevented these tragedies.
ReplyDelete