Derek Miedema, Toronto Star - November 15, 2012
Canadians can
watch disturbing videos on a government website warning about elder abuse — an
elderly man is pushed to move faster, an adult child steals money from a
grandmother’s wallet.
However, just as
some still turn a blind eye to the fact that elder abuse is happening,
proponents of assisted suicide refuse to connect the dots between legalized
assisted suicide and the potential for serious abuse.
Pressure is
mounting from assisted suicide advocates. In British Columbia, a judge struck down existing Canadian laws against assisted
suicide, giving the federal government one year to rewrite them. In the
meantime, that same judge granted Gloria Taylor a personal exemption under the
law, although she died of natural causes before using it. This case is expected
to reach the Supreme Court of Canada. The Quebec provincial government is poised
to introduce a bill in 2013 to legalize assisted suicide without waiting on the
courts. On Nov. 6, the state of Massachusetts voted down a ballot initiative
that would have made it legal for a doctor to help someone commit suicide. While
it is fantastic that this initiative failed, more are bound to come
up.
We need to
understand that legalizing assisted suicide is not about choice, empowerment or
the right to choose a time and place of death, particularly for those suffering
from severe illness. In reality, it looks quite different. Far from increasing
choices at the end of life, assisted suicide opens the door to grave abuses that
are particularly heinous when forced upon vulnerable seniors.
The nature of
elder abuse is changing. Laura Tamblyn Watts, lawyer and senior fellow at the
Canadian Centre for Elder Law, describes the financial side: “People used to
wait until their parents died until they went after the money. Today, with
longevity being what it is and with increased financial pressures, what we’re
seeing is boomers going after the assets of their parents while they’re alive.”
While she didn’t mention assisted suicide, it would be naive not to be concerned
about the implications of legalizing assisted suicide where such abuse
happens.
Will Johnston,
family physician and chair of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition of B.C., sees
elder abuse first-hand in his practice. “Under current law, abusers take their
victims to the bank and to the lawyer for a new will. With legal assisted
suicide, the next stop would be the doctor’s office for a lethal prescription,”
he writes.
It is not a big
stretch to see children orchestrating the death of their family member to access
their finances. Statistics Canada finds seniors are at higher risk of abuse by a
family member than a stranger.
In Britain, bitter
accusations are swirling around a program called the Liverpool Care Pathway,
which was established to extend quality of care practices from hospice homes to
other areas of health care dealing with the end of life. Many families are
raising questions because they believe medical staff hastened the death of their
loved ones, down to mere hours or days, when they weren’t actually dying. The
result is a public inquiry into the purported abuse. If these allegations hold
true, this would mean abuse at its worst: medical practitioners choosing to
speed up the death of patients.
There is evidence
this has happened before. A study in Belgium showed that doctors killed just
under 1,000 patients without their express request in 2007.
The spectre of
elder abuse is real. It is so real, in fact, that the government of Canada has
taken the initiative to highlight what it is and to address it in law by making
“vulnerability due to age” a factor in sentencing. Their public service
announcements challenge us to notice elder abuse where it occurs all around us.
Great. But we need to challenge others to notice that legalizing assisted
suicide could simply be a death sentence for our already abused elders. Why
would we legalize suicide for the very few when experience shows the very many
will be affected to the point of death?
Derek
Miedema is a researcher at the Institute of Marriage and Family
Canada.
The BC Civil Liberties Association is trying to make the case that assisted suicide should be a right. How they love those rights. They would, of course, be sensible about allowing that right only to certain individuals. They would insist on an "independant psychiatric evaluation" as a safeguard to ensure the competence of the person seeking their own destruction.
ReplyDeleteIt would be so tempting to fall for this deception . How reasonable it appears to require only competent people to commit suicide.
However once such a "right" is granted there is little question that it will be requested for those who do not have full mental capacity . Why should such a "right" be denied to someone "suffering" from alzheimers? Would that not be unfair ? Why should only competent individuals enjoy the "right" to suicide? You can be sure the BCCLA will soon be fighting for the "right" of all to access this privilege. Of course the victim would have no voice(being incompetent) so others who speak for her would have to claim they were acting in her best interest in seeking suicide.
Beware of those claiming that any safeguards can be put in place .